"sIFR is used on a variety of well-known web pages; GE, ABC News, Nike and Red Hat, to name but a few."
Maybe it's me, but none of them seem to be using sIFR - anymore. Maybe it's time for some new examples?
--Lennartgoosens (talk) 22:54, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Some one should say something about how the methods used by CoffeeCup effects the indexing by search engines. Also this methods look a bit obsolete to me as there is UTF-8 etc.
Simon 12:32, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Currently the home page of CuffeeCup states:
- From Wikipedia: "A high quality cross-browser, cross-platform typography solution for the masses."
And the old text of this article sated:
This sounds more like self-promotion.
Simon 12:45, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
CoffeeCup appears to be using this page as a way to gain credibility for their product, without actually linking to the official sIFR page or giving explicit credit. Sort of flakey, although the product provides value in that you don't need the Flash IDE (but there are free alternatives available).
--Mark Wubben 09:22, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Do you have any source for sIFR being ad-block incompatible? sIFR documentation claims it can handle it and my own tests show that it works fine with firefox adblockers.
-- Anonymous 13:18, 25 February 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.16.195.192 (talk)