Wikiwand AI

Talk:Serbia Centre

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More information Article milestones, Date ...
Good articleSerbia Centre has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 24, 2026Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 19, 2026.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Serbia Centre is one of the political parties that supported the creation of a transitional government during student-led protests in 2025?
Close

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Serbia Centre/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 17:33, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 03:24, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Will review.--ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 03:24, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Prose

Lead:

  • Since the beginning of the student-led anti-corruption protests Might specify which year. Also, they are still ongoing?

History:

  • Serbia Centre (SRCE) was founded on 26 June 2022,[6] while it was officially presented to the public on 6 July 2022. Might rewrite to: Serbia Centre (SRCE) was founded on 26 June 2022 and officially presented/introduced to the public on 6 July 2022.
  • Since the beginning of the student-led anti-corruption protests, SRCE has supported the students. Again specify the year/month
  • In June 2026, SRCE became part of the Platform for a European Serbia coalition. Might also mention the other parties of the coalition.
  • I also note the lead mentioned the founder's former role as former chief of the General Staff of the Serbian Armed Forces from 2006 to 2008, but it's not mentioned in the body.

Ideology and platform:

  • According to Dušan Spasojević, a professor at the Faculty of Political Sciences, during the 2022 electoral campaign Ponoš had "quite unclear positions about key issues, but a shift to the left has been noticeable" (dosta nejasan oko ključnih pitanja, ali je sad primetno njegovo blago pomeranje ulevo) since the formation of SRCE Slight rewrite to: ...Ponoš had "quite unclear positions on key issues", but had shown "a noticeable shift to the left" during the 2022 electoral campaign (dosta nejasan oko ključnih pitanja, ali je sad primetno njegovo blago pomeranje ulevo) since the formation of SRCE.
  • and allegedly "destroying the education" Might need the original Serbian quote here
  • Mention that the Faculty of Political Sciences was part of the University of Belgrade in the first instance, and delinked the second mention

Will do a quick source review.--ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 09:06, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

All done. Vacant0 (talk contribs) 11:31, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Source review

  • Refs 8, 32, 34, 40, 48 check out
  • Ref 16 seems to go to the sample vote count/projections
  • Ref 24 mentions that the SREC is boycotting, but I can't find a mention whether the coalition is dissolved
  • For the results, I'm trying to find the exact numbers for the individual parties, but I guess the popular vote counts is for the coalition as a whole?

Putting on hold.--ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 09:49, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

All done. Yes, the results are counted under Serbia Against Violence as SRCE contested under that electoral list, not on their own. Vacant0 (talk contribs) 11:32, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. Track your hook after promotion. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Beta Beta Beta (talk) 19:22, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Improved to Good Article status by Vacant0 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 26 past nominations.

Vacant0 (talk contribs) 15:37, 25 June 2026 (UTC).

    More information General: Article is new enough and long enough ...
    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Close
    More information Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems ...
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Close
    More information Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation ...
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    Close
    QPQ: Done.
    Overall: All looks good. New, got GA status on 24 June, submitted one day later. Long enough. No copyright issues, Earwig's Copyvio Detector gives 2%. Both QPQs required were done. Hooks are mentioned and cited. Verified through Google translate. I like the ALT1 over the others. Good to go. A.Cython(talk) 13:27, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

    Related Articles

    Timelines

    Top Qs

    Fact Checks