Talk:Sikh Empire

hello i just made my account , hence i cant edit but have prepared a foreign relations the sikh empire :

1) East India Company (British) : They mantained a friendly but cautious relation, Ranjit singh was careful to not provoke the british , but he also made sure that the british did not interfere in his domain.

But as Punjab fell into instability after ranjit's death,it became a threat to british and mutual suspicous began arising.

2) Afghans or Durranis : Very hostlike , was engaged in various clashes and wars.

3)Persia (qajar) : limited interactions but the persians saw the development in the region due to weaking of afghans.

4)Nepal : No formal alliance , were engaged in one war but both had anti-british sentiments.

5) China (qing) : limited interactions , sikhs were engaged in one war with Tibet under qings and resulted in stalemate and ladakh was reduced to its modern day borders.

6)Russia : possible threat, ranjit saw the development of russia in central asia

7)france :there were rumours of alliance between ranjit and napolean but no actual alliance was formed , sikh empire had many french generals and mercernaries JingJongPascal (talk) 16:29, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

User:RegentsPark are you the moderator of this page? JingJongPascal (talk) 16:30, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

@JingJongPascal: Pages don't have moderators on wikipedia. Anyone can edit any page and you can directly edit this page as long as you have satisfied the requirements described at WP:AUTOC. RegentsPark (comment) 17:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

@JingJongPascal - Do you have sources to support these proposed additions? MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 15:12, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

Summarize Timeline Fact Check

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I wish to change the map (The current one doesnt have right proportians, shows territory beyond the sutlej (other then cis-sutlej territory), places the cities in wrong spots, borders are shifted downwards, as well as other errors in the map such as the yusufzai territory being fully under sikh rule. change the map to the year 1842 (Sikhs fully aquired ladakh and therefore there greatest extent) I have created a map for this reason, please look it over. I have the sources in the description.

Proper2oo (talk) 03:42, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before posting an edit request. - Umby 🌕🐶 (talk) 04:18, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Hey, can you please elaborate on how I can establish a consensus for this? Sorry, I’m new to Wikipedia Proper2oo (talk) 16:09, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Support, user has cited their references for their map in the image's description on Wikimedia Commons. However, it would be nice if more recent sources are used (if available) to further support the cartographic depiction. MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 21:30, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Perhaps this discussion warrants a reading as it pertains to user-created maps: Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Self made Map - MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 02:24, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Hey thanks for the feedback, I can find some more modern written sources that maintain the boundaries that I have set up based on the maps, J.S Grewals, Sikhs of the Punjab relatively uphold the territories shown with a few outliers in which when shown in more detailed records (The Panjab In 1839-40 Selections From The Punjab Akhbars) which confirm said territories to be part of the extent. Since some areas are shown in maps but not in sources I have dashed them as to not possibly show a map makers mistake that stuck but still assume that these areas may of just not been mentioned when overshadowed by neighbouring lands (Example: Settlements belonging to the Khost region in modern day Afghanistan such as Bukkr Khel, Bungee, Bulameen, Zeran are very often shown in the Sikh Empire by contemporary maps, but no such mention of the Khost valley is given by written sources but in these same maps they are written under the regions of Bannu or sometimes Dour) Proper2oo (talk) 06:19, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

@Proper2oo - I see! Good work. Did you show Firozpur as part of the Sikh Empire? I believe the Brits annexed it in 1835 after the death of the heiress of the jagir. MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 21:11, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Done! Have made the Cis-Sutlej territories more detailed as well Proper2oo (talk) 22:27, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

@Proper2oo - Wow, much better! Also, I believe the Emirate of Afghanistan paid tribute to the Sikhs after the Tripartite Treaty of 1838, Bahawalpur State is also recorded as having paid tribute to the Sikhs at different times, and the Talpur Emirs of Sindh paid tribute at various points. It warrants further investigation on if the above paid tribute in around 1842. Just thought you might find it interesting and could possibly improve the map. MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 22:52, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Yes, Afghanistan (Shah Shujas Government) did pay tribute from the years of 1839-42, though im unsure if ill add it.

Other Tributaries throughout the states history would be

Bahawalpur

Bugti Tribe

Mazari Tribe

Talpur Sindh

But these were payments before 1842 Proper2oo (talk) 00:35, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

@Proper2oo - "Yes, Afghanistan (Shah Shujas Government) did pay tribute from the years of 1839-42, though im unsure if ill add it." - How come? I guess it may be contested by other editors so I understand the apprehension but if they paid tribute, then they are tributaries. Just need to provide high-quality and reliable sources to support it. MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 00:43, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

The reason is my map includes Gilgit that means it would be dated to late 1842-1843, while shah shuja was deposed in April 1842. I may change the map to be 1843 as that’s more in-line with what the map is projecting. Proper2oo (talk) 22:39, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

@Proper2oo - Makes sense to me, thanks! MaplesyrupSushi (talk) 22:47, 11 February 2026 (UTC)