Talk:Stenomask
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Voice silencers
There are also voice silencers available from Talk Technologies — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.157.237.120 (talk) 12:02, 2005 August 18 (UTC)
Removed uncited plagiarism
The entire last paragraph appeared to have been taken verbatim from the talk incorporated website without citation, so I removed it. It also seemed somewhat tangential. Feel free to bring it back and paraphrase and cite, I just thought it shouldn't be up at all in its current form. Blurble 21:13, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
Voice recognition vs speech recognition
I changed three occurrences of "voice recognition", an application that distinguishes voices from one another and from "noise", to "speech recognition", which is the action performed by voice-to-text systems, automated attendants and so on. Fenwayguy (talk) 17:01, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
The Darth Vader issue
I noticed that pro-stenomask editors have been very aggressive (or should I say, defensive?) about purging references to the common Darth Vader objection to stenomask technology from Wikipedia articles on depositions, stenomask, and the like. Most American lawyers and court reporters strongly dislike stenomask because it's incredibly weird to have someone sitting there murmuring with this Darth Vader-like mask on their face hooked up to a machine. Anyway, I'm going to have to dig up some references to reliable sources on this issue, then I'll restore those mentions. --Coolcaesar (talk) 17:38, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- I have no objections if you put this information in. I think it gives a good visual description of the device. Innab (talk) 16:03, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- I'm glad to discover that we have similar views on this issue. I find it really funny how stenomask proponents are in denial about the Darth Vader issue. --Coolcaesar (talk) 05:15, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
- I have no objections if you put this information in. I think it gives a good visual description of the device. Innab (talk) 16:03, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
