Talk:The Ocean Cleanup
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Ocean Cleanup article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
| Text and/or other creative content from this version of System 001 was copied or moved into The Ocean Cleanup with this edit on 14 December 2018. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
A fact from The Ocean Cleanup appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 November 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
Proposed content updates
![]() | The user below has a request that a significant addition or re-write be made to this article for which that user has an actual or apparent conflict of interest. The backlog is very high. Please be extremely patient. There are currently 410 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. |
Hello,
In line with the paid contribution disclosure requirements, I am proposing the following substantial updates to improve sourcing consistency, structure, and neutrality across the article.
Where appropriate, I have removed or adjusted content that relied primarily on primary sources, simplified overly detailed passages, and aligned wording more closely with independent secondary coverage.
For convenience, a consolidated draft reflecting all proposed changes is available here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Toometa/The_Ocean_Cleanup
This is only intended to provide a global overview; each proposed modification is detailed below.
Proposed update #1
Location: History section – opening sentence
| − | Slat proposed the cleanup project and supporting system in 2012 | + | Boyan Slat proposed the cleanup project and supporting system in 2012 in a TED-talk.
|
Rationale
Minor copy-edit to improve clarity and concision, without changing the underlying information or sourcing.
Proposed update #2
Location: History section – end of the opening paragraph
| − | The barriers would direct the floating plastic to the central platform, which would remove the plastic from the water | + | The barriers would direct the floating plastic to the central platform, which would remove the plastic from the water.
|
Rationale
Removes a non-informative sentence that merely notes the absence of a detail in the source, without contributing meaningful content.
Proposed update #3
Location: History section – 2014-2017: Initial prototype subsection - at the end of the first paragraph
Proposed addition:
- According to later reporting, the development process ultimately involved testing 273 scale models and six distinct prototypes before the organization finalized the design that preceded System 001.[1]
Proposed update #4
Location: History section – 2014-2017: Initial prototype subsection - last paragraph
| − | In May 2017, significant changes to the conceptual design were made | + | In May 2017, significant changes to the conceptual design were made. This included reducing the length of the boom from 100 km to 2 km to increase unit scalability, replacing seabed anchors with sea anchors to allow it to drift with currents, and replacing the automatic system for removing accumulated plastic with a manual one.
|
Rationale
Reformatting for clarity and summary style, replacing an unnecessary bullet list with equivalent prose.
Source note
The existing source supporting the first clause is retained. Of the remaining sources, the Science reference is not necessary and has been removed. The three other sources are consolidated at the end of the paragraph.
Proposed update #5
Location: History section – System 001 subsection
Removal of the opening paragraph beginning with “Tests in 2018 led to sea anchors…”.
Rationale
The statements in this paragraph are either not clearly supported by the cited sources or rely primarily on a primary source, namely a video produced by the organization itself (World Maritime News).
Proposed update #6
Location: History section – System 001 subsection
| − | On 9 September 2018, System 001 | + | On 9 September 2018, System 001 deployed from San Francisco.
|
Rationale
The nickname and pop culture reference are non-essential details and are not required in a summary-style history section.
Source note
The CNN source is removed as it is no longer necessary, and the remaining source is moved to the end of the sentence.
Proposed update #7
Location: History section – System 001 subsection
Add the following citation:
<ref>{{Cite news |last=Simon |first=Matt |title=Ocean Cleanup's Plastic Catcher Is Busted. So What Now? |url=https://www.wired.com/story/ocean-cleanups-plastic-catcher/ |access-date=2025-12-10 |work=Wired |language=en-US |issn=1059-1028}}</ref>
at the end of the sentence:
- It consisted of a 600 m (2,000 ft) long barrier with a 3 m (9.8 ft) wide skirt hanging beneath it.[citation needed]
Proposed update #8
Location: History section – System 001 subsection
| − | It was unmanned and incorporated solar-powered monitoring and navigation systems, including GPS, cameras, lanterns and AIS | + | It was unmanned and incorporated solar-powered monitoring and navigation systems, including GPS, cameras, lanterns and AIS.
|
Rationale
The supplier detail is non-essential and removed for summary-style consistency.
Proposed update #9
Location: History section
Move the “System 002 and 03” subsection above the “Interceptors 001–010” subsection.
Proposed update #10
Location: History section - “System 002 and 03 subsection” - first sentence
| − | In July 2021, a new design called System | + | In July 2021, a new design called System 002 was deployed in the Great Pacific Garbage Patch for testing.
|
Rationale
The nickname and pop culture reference are non-essential details and are not required in a summary-style history section.
Proposed update #11
Location: History section - System 002 and 03 subsection - first paragraph, last sentence
| − | In | + | In October 2021, the organization announced that the system had gathered 28,000 kilograms (62,000 lb) of trash, and announced plans for System 03, which would span up to 2.5 km (1.6 mi).
|
Rationale
This change clarifies the timeline and removes unnecessary repetition, while fully preserving the information as supported by the source.
Proposed update #12
Location: History section - System 002 and 03 subsection - first paragraph
| − | In May 2023, the project deployed its System 03 barrier, 2,250 meters long. The system | + | In May 2023, the project deployed its System 03 barrier, 2,250 meters long. The system incorporated design changes intended to reduce ecological impacts, including modifications to the retention area and the addition of a marine animal escape mechanism.
|
Rationale
The rewording aligns the statement more closely with the scope and level of detail supported by the available source (Wired).
Proposed update #13
Location: History section - System 002 and 03 subsection
Removal of the paragraph beginning with “System 03 has about 5× the capacity of System 002…”, as it is supported solely by a primary source.
Proposed update #14
Location: History section - Interceptors 001-010 subsection
Change the subsection title from “Interceptors 001–010” to “Interceptors”, as the individual numbering (including up to 010) is not supported by specific secondary references.
Proposed update #15
Location: History section - Interceptors subsection - first paragraph
| − | In October 2019, The Ocean Cleanup unveiled | + | In October 2019, The Ocean Cleanup unveiled the Interceptor, a solar-powered system designed to remove plastic from rivers before it reaches the ocean. The first two Interceptor units were deployed in Klang (Malaysia) and Jakarta (Indonesia).
|
Rationale The revised wording better reflects the level of detail and phrasing supported by the cited source, while improving clarity and maintaining an appropriate summary style.
Source note
The DesignBoom source is sufficient to support the information contained in both sentences. The Maritime Executive source can be removed as it is not adequately aligned with the statements.
Proposed update #16
Location: History section - Interceptors subsection - second paragraph
| − | In January 2020, flooding broke the barrier of Interceptor 001 in Jakarta. It was replaced with a newer model with a stronger screen, simpler design, and an adjustable better-defined weak link | + | In January 2020, flooding broke the barrier of Interceptor 001 in Jakarta. It was replaced with a newer model with a stronger screen, simpler design, and an adjustable better-defined weak link.
|
Rationale
The removed sentences are either not clearly supported by the cited sources or rely on a broken link and what appears to be a primary source (a press release).
Source note
Retain only the EcoWatch source for the remaining paragraph, as it is sufficient to support the content.
Proposed update #17
Location: History section - Interceptors subsection - third paragraph
| − | In | + | In October 2022, an Interceptor Original was deployed near the mouth of Ballona Creek in southwestern Los Angeles County, California. This installation was the first Interceptor Original in the United States.
|
Rationale
The existing wording is not supported by the cited source and relies on a primary source. The revised version reflects what is explicitly supported by independent sources and removes unsupported claims.
Source note
Remove the current source and add the following two at the end of the paragraph:
<ref>{{Cite web |last=Jacques |first=Justin |date=2023-07-05 |title=‘Interceptor’ Keeps More Than 75 Tons of Debris Out of Pacific Ocean |url=https://stormwater.wef.org/2023/07/interceptor-keeps-more-than-75-tons-of-debris-out-of-pacific-ocean/ |access-date=2026-02-11 |website=Stormwater Report |language=en-US}}</ref>
<ref>{{Cite web |last=Alford |first=Joseph |title=Home |url=https://ballonainterceptor.lacounty.gov/ |access-date=2026-02-11 |website=Ballona Creek Interceptor |language=en-US}}</ref>
Proposed update #18
Location: History section - Interceptors subsection - last paragraph
| − | In May 2022, the Ocean Cleanup trialed a new Interceptor called Trashfence on the Rio Las Vacas, a tributary of the Rio Motagua, in Guatemala. It was anchored to the riverbed, and the anchors washed out. | + | In May 2022, the Ocean Cleanup trialed a new Interceptor called Trashfence on the Rio Las Vacas, a tributary of the Rio Motagua, in Guatemala. It was anchored to the riverbed, and the anchors washed out.[1] In 2023, The Ocean Cleanup deployed Interceptor 006 on the Río Las Vacas in Guatemala.[2]
|
Rationale
The removed material is not supported by the cited source and relies on a primary source (The Ocean Cleanup’s website). Unfortunately, the remaining content in this paragraph also appears to rely primarily on primary sources. I leave it to the reviewer’s discretion whether the entire paragraph should be removed on sourcing grounds.
Proposed update #19
Location: History section - at the end
Proposed addition
Addition of a new subsection titled “30 Cities Program”, with the following content:
- During the United Nations Oceans Conference in 2025, The Ocean Cleanup announced an updated strategy in their mission to remove floating ocean plastic: the 30 Cities Program.[2]
- The 30 Cities Program shifts The Ocean Cleanup’s strategy from addressing individual rivers to targeting entire urban areas with multiple polluted waterways. According to the organization, deploying Interceptors across 30 key cities could prevent up to 30 percent of river-borne plastic from reaching the ocean by the end of the decade.[3]
- This evolution in strategy follows The Ocean Cleanup’s identification of the 1,000 rivers responsible for most of the world’s river-borne plastic,[3] as well as lessons learned from the deployment of their first 20 Interceptors.[2] In addition to intercepting plastic before it reaches the ocean, the 30 Cities Program also includes efforts to remove debris from nearby coasts, mangroves, and coral reefs, using data-driven mapping tools such as drones, AI image recognition, and GPS-tracked dummy plastics to guide operations.[2]
- The first eight participating cities have been named as Bangkok (Thailand), Jakarta (Indonesia), Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia), Los Angeles (United States), Manila (Philippines), Montego Bay (Jamaica), Mumbai (India) and Panama City (Panama).[2][3]
Proposed update #20
Location: Research section
Complete removal of the subsection “Scientific findings.”
Rationale
The subsection relies almost entirely on primary scientific publications and summarizes their findings directly, without substantial independent secondary coverage discussing these results. Moreover, the content largely concerns broader environmental science topics rather than encyclopedic information about the organization itself.
Proposed update #21
Location: Research section
Removal of the subsection heading “Oceanic expeditions,” which is no longer necessary if Proposed update #20 is accepted, and modification of the first paragraph as follows:
| − | In August 2015, The Ocean Cleanup conducted the Mega Expedition, | + | In August 2015, The Ocean Cleanup conducted the Mega Expedition, during which a fleet of around 30 vessels, led by the R/V Ocean Starr, collected plastic samples across the Great Pacific Garbage Patch in an effort to reassess the scale and composition of the debris.
|
Rationale
The removed sentence relied on a primary source and contained promotional language. The revised wording aligns more closely with the available independent source and avoids unsupported claims.
Source note Retain only the SFGate source at the end of the paragraph.
Proposed update #22
Location: Funding section - second paragraph
| − | + | Since 2019, the organization has been funded mainly through donations and in-kind sponsors, including Maersk, Salesforce.com chief executive Marc Benioff, Peter Thiel, Julius Baer Foundation, The Coca-Cola Company and Royal DSM.
|
Rationale
Minor wording adjustment for clarity and tense consistency, without altering the meaning or adding new information.
Proposed update #23
Location: Funding section - fourth paragraph
| − | In October 2020, they unveiled a product made from plastic certified from the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, The Ocean Cleanup sunglasses, to help fund the continuation of the cleanup. They | + | In October 2020, they unveiled a product made from plastic certified from the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, The Ocean Cleanup sunglasses, to help fund the continuation of the cleanup. They worked with DNV GL to develop a certification for plastic from water sources and the sunglasses were certified to originate from the GPGP. The sunglasses were designed by Yves Béhar and manufactured by Safilo. 21,000 units were made and put on sale at €200 apiece. They sold out in early 2022.
|
Rationale
Editorial adjustment for readability; no substantive change.
Proposed update #24
Location: Funding section - sixth paragraph
| − | In 2022, Kia | + | In 2022, Kia became a global partner of The Ocean Cleanup, providing funding and in-kind contributions to support its cleanup operations.
|
Rationale
The current paragraph relies entirely on a primary source and includes claims that are not clearly supported by that source. The proposed revision replaces the paragraph with wording based strictly on an independent secondary source (Newsweek), aligning the content with what is explicitly reported there and removing unsupported detail.
Source note
Replace the current primary source with the following secondary source:
<ref>{{Cite news |last=Falkenberg-Hull |first=Eileen |date=2025-04-15 |title=Cleaner Water: Kia and The Ocean Cleanup Partner to Green the Planet |url=https://www.newsweek.com/2025/05/02/cleaner-water-kia-ocean-cleanup-partner-green-planet-2056497.html |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20250426113426/https://www.newsweek.com/2025/05/02/cleaner-water-kia-ocean-cleanup-partner-green-planet-2056497.html |archive-date=2025-04-26 |access-date=2026-01-16 |work=Newsweek |language=en}}</ref>
Proposed update #25
Location: Funding section - at the end
Proposed addition
Proposed update #26
Location: Efficacy issues and possible negative impacts section - at the end of the second paragraph
Proposed addition
| − | A modelling study concluded that it is currently impossible to determine how damaging at-sea plastic removal strategies (such as those of The Ocean Cleanup) would be for marine life, with impacts potentially ranging from mild to severe.
| + | A modelling study concluded that it is currently impossible to determine how damaging at-sea plastic removal strategies (such as those of The Ocean Cleanup) would be for marine life, with impacts potentially ranging from mild to severe. In 2025, The Ocean Cleanup published a peer-reviewed environmental assessment of its activities, which concluded that, according to the authors, the modeled benefits of ocean plastic removal outweighed the associated environmental costs, including greenhouse gas emissions and ecosystem impacts.
|
Source note
Use the following source to support the addition:
<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Egger |first=Matthias |last2=Booth |first2=Andy M. |last3=Bosker |first3=Thijs |last4=Everaert |first4=Gert |last5=Garrard |first5=Samantha L. |last6=Havas |first6=Vilma |last7=Huntley |first7=Helga S. |last8=Koelmans |first8=Albert A. |last9=Kvale |first9=Karin |last10=Lebreton |first10=Laurent |last11=Niemann |first11=Helge |last12=Pang |first12=Qiaotong |last13=Proietti |first13=Maira |last14=Puskic |first14=Peter |last15=Richon |first15=Camille |date=2025-05-27 |title=Evaluating the environmental impact of cleaning the North Pacific Garbage Patch |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-00619-w |journal=Scientific Reports |volume=15 |issue=1 |pages=16736 |doi=10.1038/s41598-025-00619-w |issn=2045-2322 |language=en }}</ref>
Rationale
The proposed addition aims to provide contextual balance within the paragraph. It is acknowledged that the cited source is a primary source (a scientific study authored by members of the organization). However, the preceding sentence in the paragraph also relies on a primary scientific study that has not been discussed in independent secondary coverage. For reasons of consistency in sourcing standards, if the present addition is deemed inappropriate due to its reliance on a primary source, it may also be appropriate to reassess the preceding statement on similar grounds. I leave this to the reviewer’s discretion.
Proposed update #27
Location: History section
Replace with a more recent freely licensed image available on Wikimedia Commons: commons:File:Boyan_Slat.jpg
Proposed update #28
Location: Lead section
| − | The Ocean Cleanup is a nonprofit | + | The Ocean Cleanup is a nonprofit organization based in the Netherlands that develops and scales technologies to remove floating plastic pollution from oceans and rivers. Founded in 2013 by Dutch inventor Boyan Slat, the organization conducts research on ocean and river plastic pollution, designs offshore cleanup systems deployed in the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, and operates a range of river-based Interceptor devices in multiple countries.
Since its early feasibility studies and prototype tests between 2014 and 2017, The Ocean Cleanup has released several generations of ocean systems, including System 001, System 002, and the larger System 03. In parallel, the organization has expanded its river program with deployments in Asia, the Americas, and the Caribbean.
The project has received significant public attention for both its ambitious goals and the technical challenges it has encountered, and it has also published scientific research on the movement and accumulation of plastic in marine environments.
|
Rationale
The current lead is overly detailed, includes claims not clearly reflected in the body of the article, and departs from standard lead structure.
The revised version condenses the content, removes promotional or predictive elements, and aligns strictly with material that is covered and sourced in the body of the article, in order to ensure compliance with summary style and neutrality.
---
Thank you very much for your time and consideration. I remain fully open to discussion and adjustments based on community feedback. Best, Toometa (talk) 07:55, 13 February 2026 (UTC)


