Talk:UFC 149

• What is the correct way to include the missing UFC 149? How should the omitted UFC 149 be restored?? Teterev53 (talk) 21:52, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

So every other UFC event has its own page except from 149 on? Come on. It's for a title belt and it is much easier to read the individual pages than have a single page with 200+ references. I have no idea why this kind of thing happens. Do you want wikipedia to be as mediocre as possible? If so, keep it up, you're doing a fine job! Maybe we should have all of the world's election results on a single page to scroll through next. It doesn't make sense to have them separate right?

Please quit abusing your privileges as editors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kagetto (talk • contribs) 02:43, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

• Blame boxing fans and pacifists. 50.98.62.120 (talk) 14:27, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

This event hasn't occured yet so there is still a ton of information still to come to light about this event. Why is it not even possible to edit it and bring it up to the quality of a stand alone article like every other UFC event? This is very suspicious. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pull lead (talk • contribs) 22:11, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

It twice went to AfD (see big notices at the top of the page) and on both occasions the outcome was that this event does not meet the WP notability requirements for it's own article. Mtking ^(edits) 22:35, 22 April 2012 (UTC)