Talk:Underground Astronauts
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article was nominated for deletion on 11 April 2019. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Anyone, nominate this article for deletion
Ãnyone should nominate this article for deletion. The phrase/name is not notable, although used by media perhaps more than once. (Later one can deal with the issue of university students who each have their article on Wikipedia.) @Bledwith:. Signed, another 30-meter-underground-"astronaut", 89.8.158.26 (talk) 15:00, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
In 2019 there was a half-hearted attempt at having the articled merged (and thereby deleted). However there was no claim that the phrase/name is not notable. When nominating the article for deletion again, there needs to be a justification or rationale, for deletion: Example, "non-notable name/phrase".
I support having the article deleted - the name/phrase does not seem notable, even though media has used the name/phrase at least once. 89.8.158.26 (talk) 17:37, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Evolution of the Genus Homo
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 March 2022 and 3 June 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cornyon (article contribs).
"Controversy"
Regarding the final sentence of this section; does the fact Berger released the findings as open access really add to the controversy? Surely, this particular move has not been criticised or deemed controversial. 2A02:C7C:5690:A000:6DA0:3C03:1043:2CB (talk) 11:23, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- If I am wrong about that then it needs to be explained in the paragraph. 2A02:C7C:5690:A000:6DA0:3C03:1043:2CB (talk) 11:24, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

