Talk:Visual neuroscience
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Visual neuroscience article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
History=
Untitled
Should this have a history section?
Comments
In order to familiarize the scientists at Smith-Kettlewell with wikipedia practices/advantages I create "placeholder" entries that provide the essence of what the named topic will contain.
For some reason the entry on infant vision had its body "reverted" with a redirect to infant (which does not have any significant information about vision in infants) without explanation. I re-entered it after yanksox had redirected it twice - I believe either in error or at least without explanation.
Love.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Love26 (talk • contribs) 15:57, 20 May 2006 (UTC).
this article needed a lot more to it. --Krystathedancer (talk) 19:53, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
I think that revising the paragraph was a good idea along with adding the citiation...it would have been nice to have seen another citation or additional information added to the article Rameyer13 (talk) 00:13, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
