Talk:Vizio
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article was nominated for deletion on 6 October 2025. The result of the discussion was Speedy keep. |
| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Sony?
Was Vizio really part of Sony?
- Rumors around various forums have been that Vizio is a subsidiary of Sony, but I've found nothing to confirm that. --LaraLove 19:07, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
I don't really think so. All Sonys and Samsungs use S-LCD Panels which is a joint venture between Sony and Samsung. See S-LCD. I've seen several carrying LG Philips and AUO panels (along with S-LCDs) when I opened up the back of them to repair.
--Calvinleemk 00:55, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Vizio logo.png

Image:Vizio logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 11:24, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Found date
The article lists a found date of 1999 and the article is categorized as founded in 2003. That needs to be resolved. --William Graham talk 16:07, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
The complaints are not sourced! 57.72.22.77 (talk) 01:53, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Semi-protected
Dates
Will someone please update the information on vizio's expanding consumer electronics portfolio. It has already begun selling the via tablet and CES 2011 is far over — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hockeyking123 (talk • contribs) 23:03, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Complaints
http://www.consumeraffairs.com/home_electronics/vizio.html (CaptianNemo (talk) 02:10, 29 December 2011 (UTC))
- Company does not renew product portfolio (of televisions), drops to #3 with a 44% drop in volume (of sales, I presume); also, a user experience failure was noticed. -Mardus (talk) 21:45, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
Edit requested
| This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hello, I'm reaching out on behalf of the Corporate Marketing department at VIZIO about a couple inaccuracies we identified on the page. I went in and corrected the incorrect or outdated information but wanted to send a quick note about what we changed and validate why we did. All changes are fact based and are not promotional in any way.
1. Can we please submit our updated logo? 2. Our current tagline is "Beautifully Simple." so I have updated that as it is current. 3. In our description: we are a privately held consumer electronics company, so I have eliminated "producer of". 4. In the History section: The company did not start out as GreenDane. We do not know who/what GreenDane is. We did start out as "V Inc." so I have revised as such. 5. In the History section: The company does not have an office in Magna, Utah, nor did we ever. The articles listed here do not reference Magna, Utah either so I have eliminated Magna Utah from the section. 6. The last section that says "VIZIO's major partner in the consumer electronics arena is AmTran Technology, a Taiwan-based OEM/ODM that manufacturers more than half of the televisions sold by VIZIO and owns a 23% stake int he company", is outdated and inaccurate. I eliminated this sentence. 7. In the Television Sets section: We did not unveil an R Series in 2012, so I have eliminated that. 8. In the Television Sets section: We have not produced "LCD computer monitors", so I eliminated the word "computer."
Thank you and please let me know if you have any questions.
70.168.249.198 (talk) 00:24, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Edit
All Caps on VIZIO?
Controversy versus Television_sets
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. A reviewer felt that this edit would not improve the article. |
I would like to request an edit on behalf of the corporate PR team at VIZIO. One comment on the page could be considered opinionated and is redundant with an earlier section. The earlier section is mostly correct and only needs a mild tweak. I have provided objective references for each comment, below.
In section 3 “Controversy” (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vizio#History< ) there is a comment that references op-ed news articles about VIZIO’s collection of viewing habits: "In November 2015 it was revealed that Vizio was collecting information on its customers and selling it to advertisers.[28] To settle the case, in which Vizio were accused of using 11 million televisions to spy on customers, the company agreed to pay out $2.2 million.[29][30][31]”
Per the FTC notice on the topic, [1] Vizio is not accused of spying. This is an opinion of the journalists who wrote the op-ed articles. VIZIO is accused of collecting anonymous viewer history. At the very least, this section is redundant with section 2.1.
In Section 2.1: Televisions, paragraph 3 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vizio#Television_sets) there is a more accurate version of the issue: "Vizio 'Smart TV' sets track viewers' habits and share them with advertisers, a practice that cable TV companies are prohibited from doing but that Vizio says is legal for TV manufacturers.[16] On February 6 of 2017, the Federal Trade Commission announced a settlement[17] with Vizio to pay $2.2 million to settle charges by the FTC and the Office of the New Jersey Attorney General that it installed software on its TVs to collect viewing data on 11 million consumer TVs without consumers’ knowledge or consent. The settlement required Vizio to delete the data it had captured and change its data collection practices."
This section would be more correct if it the word “can” were added, as follows. "Vizio "Smart TV" sets can [2] track viewers' habits and share them with advertisers, a practice that cable TV companies are prohibited from doing but that Vizio says is legal for TV manufacturers.[16] On February 6 of 2017, the Federal Trade Commission announced a settlement[17] with Vizio to pay $2.2 million to settle charges by the FTC and the Office of the New Jersey Attorney General that it installed software on its TVs to collect viewing data on 11 million consumer TVs without consumers’ knowledge or consent. The settlement required Vizio to delete the data it had captured and change its data collection practices.”
- This addition ("can" above) reflects the fact that the process is voluntary and can be disabled through the “Smart Interactivity” setting in the user settings menu.
BBQguy (talk) 22:24, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
