Talk:Yodlee
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. |
Spam
this article is clearly spam, put up here straight from the pr desk of yodlee...
- they must not be very good PR people. The article says, "rather than market directly to consumers, Yodlee partners with other institutions." What about Yodlee Moneycenter, which lets consumers sign up directly for Yodlee's service?
- I'd edit the article to add this, but why should I do some PR guy's job? He makes more than me. And anyway, I should be doing my own job, since I'm here at work.
151.199.244.218 (talk) 02:29, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Chitrou59 apparently believes or has evidence that Yodlee's status as a TRUSTe sealholder is beyond question. If Chitrou59 has such evidence, perhaps they would like to supply proof to this article, instead of removing my references that indicate they are *not* a listed sealholder?
Or perhaps they would like to direct me and others to a "contact us" form that does *not* require opening an account first, in order to ask Yodlee directly about their TRUSTe status. Slhenty (talk) 16:10, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Company website is not a reliable source
Three of the sources for this article are from the company's own website. I fail to see how they can possibly be considered "reliable sources". Wikipedia's RS policy says "Reliable sources may be published materials with a reliable publication process, authors who are regarded as authoritative in relation to the subject, or both." Unless someone can convince me otherwise, I will remove them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cwelgo (talk • contribs) 12:56, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Seeing no objection, it is done. Cwelgo (talk) 13:21, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
