The Investigation (play)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Written byPeter Weiss
CharactersJudge
Prosecuting Attorney
Counsel for the Defense
Witnesses, numbered 1–9
Adjutant Mulka
Boger
Dr. Capesius
Dr. Frank
Dr. Schatz
Dr. Lucas
Kaduk
Hofmann
Medical Orderly Klehr
Scherpe
Hantl
SS Corporal Stark
Baretzki
Schlage
Bischoff
Broad
Breitwieser
Bednarek
Date premieredOctober 19, 1965 (1965-10-19)
Place premieredSimultaneously at 15 theatres (full-scale theatre productions: West Berlin, Cologne, Essen, Munich, Rostock, play readings: East Berlin, Cottbus, Dresden, Gera, Leuna, London, Meiningen, Neustrelitz, Potsdam and Weimar)
The Investigation: Oratorio in 11 Cantos
The Investigation at Staatstheater Nürnberg (2009). Photo by Marion Bührle
Written byPeter Weiss
CharactersJudge
Prosecuting Attorney
Counsel for the Defense
Witnesses, numbered 1–9
Adjutant Mulka
Boger
Dr. Capesius
Dr. Frank
Dr. Schatz
Dr. Lucas
Kaduk
Hofmann
Medical Orderly Klehr
Scherpe
Hantl
SS Corporal Stark
Baretzki
Schlage
Bischoff
Broad
Breitwieser
Bednarek
Date premieredOctober 19, 1965 (1965-10-19)
Place premieredSimultaneously at 15 theatres (full-scale theatre productions: West Berlin, Cologne, Essen, Munich, Rostock, play readings: East Berlin, Cottbus, Dresden, Gera, Leuna, London, Meiningen, Neustrelitz, Potsdam and Weimar)
Original languageGerman
SubjectFrankfurt Auschwitz Trials (1963–65)
SettingCourtroom

The Investigation (1965) is a play by German playwright Peter Weiss that depicts the Frankfurt Auschwitz Trials of 1963–1965. It carries the subtitle "Oratorio in 11 Cantos". Weiss was an observer at the trials and developed the play partially from the reports of Bernd Naumann. The work premiered on October 19, 1965 on stages in fourteen West and East German cities and at the Royal Shakespeare Company in London. In 1966 the production was presented at the Royal Dramatic Theatre in Stockholm which featured sets and costumes designed by Weiss's wife, Gunilla Palmstierna-Weiss, and was directed by Ingmar Bergman.[1]

The Investigation was originally supposed to be part of a larger "World-Theater Project", which was to follow the structure of Dante Alighieri's Divine Comedy. The three-part theater project was supposed to include the three realms of Paradise, Hell, and Purgatory. In an inversion of Dante's beliefs, The Investigation was supposed to correspond to the "Paradise" and yet be a place of despair for its victims. Inferno, written in 1964 but first published in 2003 as part of Weiss' estate, described the netherworld in its title. Due to the historical significance of the Auschwitz Trial, the Divine Comedy project was shelved. Weiss published the first third separately as The Investigation.

Content and structure

The play takes place in a courtroom during the Frankfurt Auschwitz trials (1963–1965). Weiss did not intend a literal reconstruction of the courtroom nor representation of the camp itself.[2] Auschwitz is present only in the words of the perpetrators, the victims, and the personnel of the court.

The Investigation is divided into eleven Dantean "cantos," each of which is subdivided into three parts. This 33-part structure mimics Dante's Divine Comedy. Weiss's cantos depict the 'progress' of the victims from the ramp upon arrival at Auschwitz to the gas chambers and the ovens, revealing ever more horrendous moments in the perpetration of the Nazi genocide. Weiss refrains from all dramatic embellishments. The focus is entirely on the spoken word, often taken verbatim from the trial. Weiss's seemingly minimalist intervention in the protocols shows the dramatist (and former painter and filmmaker) who only a year earlier had created the sensational and wildly theatrical play Marat/Sade at the height of his art. The Investigation succeeds in transforming the actual protocols into a work of literature and art – to the extent that art may be best suited to convey a sense of the experience and preserve the memory of the Holocaust.

In the cantos, the dramatist sets the statements of the anonymous witnesses against the named defendants and former SS concentration camp guards. Unlike at the historical trial, only eighteen defendants stand before the court. The statements of several hundred witnesses at the actual trials are condensed in the play in the Witnesses 1–9. Two of the witnesses worked at the camp but side with the defendants, the others, including two women, are victims who through an unlikely series of coincidences (as they repeatedly emphasize) survived the camp. By anonymizing the witnesses/victims, the play reproduces the fact that they were just numbers robbed of their identities, as well as their lives.

The victims' testimonies are numbing in their endlessly detailed inventory of the atrocities committed at the concentration camp. The perpetrators counter with derisive denials and clichéd rejections of their individual responsibilities. This goes to the core question of how much room for individual action and responsibility is available even under the most constricted of circumstances. The play ends before the verdicts are announced, an ending which rejects the notion that there could be any punishment commensurate with genocidal crime or which might bring closure to the victims.

Linguistic style and rhetoric of exoneration

Peter Weiss (1916–1982) was born in Germany but in 1934 went with his family into exile and lived for all of his adult life in Sweden where he also became a citizen. The Investigation, like most of his work, was written in German. It consists of clear, straightforward sentence structures, a strict parataxical style and has no punctuation at all. The past is recapitulated factually and soberly, without emotion. The alienation effect is used to achieve an intensified dramatic effect on the viewer. The rhythm of the utterances of the figures works towards the same goal. As part of the goal of universalization, the word "Jew" is not used in the entire play.

The defendants use a number of strategies to exonerate themselves by minimizing, denying, or justifying their actions:

  • discrediting the witnesses or prosecutors
  • presenting a self-image as a victim
  • relying on the former legal and value system and the superior orders defense, the general acceptance and similar actions of others
  • denial of guilt and downplaying of their own roles
  • evasive answers, claiming lack of knowledge
  • evidence of "successful rehabilitation" since 1945
  • pleading the statute of limitations

Few of the defendants acknowledge their guilt. Witnesses 1 and 2 are primarily apologetic. Weiss uses this to illustrate the complex of "second guilt", a concept which Ralph Giordano brought up in his book The Second Guilt and the Burden of Being German. Giordano argued that in their failure to acknowledge and address the collective crimes of the Nazi era, contemporaries of the Third Reich after 1945 brought upon themselves a "second guilt", distinct from the guilt associated with the crimes themselves.[3]

Reception and criticism

References

Further reading

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI