The Schenk Law Firm, LLP
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Lynn Schenk (Co-founder)
Benjamin Schenk (Co-founder)
David Lizerbram (Partner)
| Headquarters | San Diego, California, United States |
|---|---|
| Major practice areas | Personal injury, mass tort litigation, AI and digital tort litigation, civil rights, environmental law, business advisory |
| Key people | Frederick Schenk (Founding Managing Partner) Lynn Schenk (Co-founder) Benjamin Schenk (Co-founder) David Lizerbram (Partner) |
| Date founded | February 2025 |
The Schenk Law Firm, LLP is a comprehensive litigation and transactional law firm based in San Diego, California, founded in February 2025 by trial attorney Frederick ("Fred") Schenk, former U.S. Representative Lynn Schenk, and attorney Benjamin Schenk.[1][2] The firm's practice areas include personal injury, mass tort litigation, AI and digital tort related litigation, civil rights, environmental law, and business advisory services.[3] In February 2026, the firm merged with Lizerbram Law, APC, adding transactional and intellectual property capabilities to create a full-service legal platform.[3][4]
The Schenk Law Firm launched in February 2025, combining trial-law expertise, public-sector leadership, and financial experience.[2][1][5] Fred Schenk, who spent approximately 40 years as a partner at Casey Gerry Schenk Francavilla Blatt & Penfield, LLP, is the firm's founding managing partner.[1][2] Lynn Schenk, who served in the U.S. House of Representatives and as chief of staff to California Governor Gray Davis, joined as co-founder.[6][7] Benjamin Schenk, a trial attorney and Bridgewater Associates alumnus, joined as co-founder.[1][3]
In February 2026, the firm finalized a merger with Lizerbram Law, APC. David Lizerbram joined as partner to lead transactional and business advisory work, making the combined practice one of the few plaintiff litigation firms with an integrated business law component.[3][4]
Practice areas and representative matters
AI chatbot mental-health harm litigation
In January 2026, the firm filed DeCruise v. OpenAI, Inc. in California Superior Court on behalf of a Morehouse College student who alleged that interactions with ChatGPT's GPT-4o model caused severe psychiatric harm, including a psychosis diagnosis and hospitalization.[8][9]
Attorney Benjamin Schenk stated that OpenAI "engineered GPT-4o to simulate emotional intimacy, foster psychological dependency, and blur the line between human and machine."[9] The firm has positioned itself as "AI injury attorneys" and is investigating additional AI-related mental health claims nationwide.[10][8]
Personal injury and wrongful death
The firm's personal injury practice focuses on significant injury cases and wrongful death claims, including matters involving asbestos-related harm, automobile and bicycle collisions, construction negligence, and traumatic brain injury.[1][2] Fred Schenk obtained the largest verdict ever in San Diego against an asbestos manufacturer, Owens Corning Fiberglass.[11][12]
Tobacco litigation
In the 1990s, Fred Schenk served as a personal legal advisor to then-Lieutenant Governor Gray Davis in a private attorney general action against tobacco companies that resulted in the recovery of billions of dollars for the State of California.[13] The broader 1998 Master Settlement Agreement between tobacco companies and U.S. states resulted in payments of hundreds of billions of dollars.[14]
NFL concussion multidistrict litigation
In 2012, U.S. District Judge Anita Brody appointed Fred Schenk to the Plaintiffs' Steering Committee overseeing the national multidistrict litigation (MDL) against the National Football League (NFL), alleging that repeated concussions can result in long-term brain injuries including chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE).[15]
Social media youth addiction litigation
In 2023, Los Angeles Superior Court judge Carolyn Kuhl appointed Fred Schenk to the plaintiffs' steering committee in the California Judicial Council Coordination Proceedings (JCCP) involving litigation over alleged harms tied to youth social media addiction. The proceedings involve claims against several major social media companies, including Meta Platforms, Inc., YouTube, LLC, TikTok Inc., and Snap Inc.[16]