The Wedding of Lilli Marlene
1953 film by Arthur Crabtree
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Wedding of Lilli Marlene is a 1953 British drama film directed by Arthur Crabtree and starring Lisa Daniely, Hugh McDermott and Sid James.[1][2][3] It was written by John Baines and was a sequel to the 1950 film Lilli Marlene, also directed by Crabtree.[4][5]
Hugh McDermott
Sid James
| The Wedding of Lilli Marlene | |
|---|---|
Trade ad from The Daily Film Renter, 1953 | |
| Directed by | Arthur Crabtree |
| Screenplay by | John Baines |
| Produced by | William J. Gell |
| Starring | Lisa Daniely Hugh McDermott Sid James |
| Cinematography | Arthur Grant |
| Edited by | Douglas Myers |
| Music by | Eric Rogers |
Production company | Monarch Productions |
| Distributed by | Monarch Film Corporation |
Release date |
|
Running time | 87 minutes |
| Country | United Kingdom |
| Language | English |
Premise
After the end of the Second World War, Lilli Marlene and American reporter Steve Moray plan to marry, but when Lilli gets a chance for a big break on the London stage, it throws their plans into disarray.
Cast
- Lisa Daniely as Lilli Marlene
- Hugh McDermott as Steve Moray, Lilli's fiancé
- Sid James as Finnimore Hunt
- Gabrielle Brune as Maggie Lennox
- Jack Billings as Hal Marvel
- Robert Ayres as Andrew Jackson
- Joan Heal as Linda
- John Blythe as Holt
- Mairhi Russell as Mrs. Smith
- Irene Handl as Rosie, the Eastern European dresser
- Wally Patch as Wally
- Dandy Nichols as Mrs. Harris
- Ann Bennett as Forbes
- Ben Williams as Ted
- Tom Gill as Willy
- Jacques Cey as Vittorio
- Ernst Ulman as Salmon
- Jacqueline Mackenzie as theatre barmaid
- Charmian Buchel as Becky
- George Roderick as theatrical agent
- Stanley Baker as audience member
Production
It was made at Southall Studios with sets designed by the art director Ray Simm.
Critical reception
The Monthly Film Bulletin wrote: "Although Lisa Daniely has a pleasant voice, the ineffective musical numbers do not help to enliven this tedious picture of show business in London."[6]
Leslie Halliwell said: "Poorly confected programme filler, an unnecessary sequel if ever there was one."[7]
In British Sound Films: The Studio Years 1928–1959 David Quinlan rated the film as "poor", writing: "Long, stiff and tedious."[8]