Wikiwand AI

Town of Chester v. Laroe Estates, Inc.

2017 United States Supreme Court case From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Town of Chester v. Laroe Estates, Inc., 581 U.S. 433 (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that a litigant seeking to intervene as of right under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a)(2) must meet the requirements of Article III standing if the intervenor wishes to pursue relief not requested by a plaintiff.[1][2]

Full case nameTown of Chester v. Laroe Estates, Inc.
Docket no.16-605
Citations581 U.S. 433 (more)
MajorityAlito, joined by unanimous
Quick facts Decided June 5, 2017, Full case name ...
Town of Chester v. Laroe Estates, Inc.
Decided June 5, 2017
Full case nameTown of Chester v. Laroe Estates, Inc.
Docket no.16-605
Citations581 U.S. 433 (more)
Holding
A litigant seeking to intervene as of right under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a)(2) must meet the requirements of Article III standing if the intervenor wishes to pursue relief not requested by a plaintiff.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Anthony Kennedy · Clarence Thomas
Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan · Neil Gorsuch
Case opinion
MajorityAlito, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(a)(2)
Close

References

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks