Ueekenkcoracias

The holotype specimen of Ueekenkcoracias consists of an incomplete right leg, preserved as a slab and counterslab. As Coraciiformes, the tibiotarsus of the holotype is short and stout, proportionally longer than in Eocoracias. The crista cnemialis cranialis is small and triangular, but is more developed than that of Eocoracias,Paracoracias, rollers, kingfishers and bee-eaters. The diaphysis of the tibiotarsus is relatively stout, and is curved laterally (to the side). The pons supratendineus has a transverse disposition, as in Geranopteridae and motmots, and is located medially on the shaft, as in rollers and ground rollers. The distal (far) epiphysis widens distally, as in rollers, ground rollers and todies, but not as much as Leptosomidae. The tarsometatarsus of U. tambussiae is short and wide, measuring less than half the tibiotarsus' length,^[1] which is unlike most coraciiforms. The pedal (foot) phalanges are more robust than in coraciiforms, and the second bears a greatly enlarged ungual. In these regards, U. tambussiae resembles Palaeopsittacus.^[2]

In their paper describing Ueekenkcoracias, Degrange et al. (2021) performed a phylogenetic analysis which recovered it as the most basal member of Coracii. This position was supported by the lack of derived features, such as a deep infracotylar fossa on the tarsometatarsus, which are present in all other coraciians.^[1]

Below is a cladogram depicting the results of Degrange et al. (2021):^[1]

However, the results of the above phylogeny have been questioned. German palaeontologist Gerard Mayr noted that, contrary to Degrange et al., the limb elements of U. tambussiae were quite different from those of coraciians. He categorically dismissed the hypothesis that it was a coraciiform, and pointed out that the above traits were instead more similar to Palaeopsittacus, a European taxon that may be closer to Strisores (the clade including hummingbirds, nightjars, and swifts).^[2] The remains of U. tambussiae are too incomplete to make any firm judgements in regards to its phylogenetic position.^[3]