User:Jay L09

Sports (Mutations)

Over the years, many mutations, or sports, have been identified in Red Delicious apple trees. In addition to those that were propagated without any legal protection (or cut out because they were seen as inferior) 42 sports were patented in the United States:

More information Plant Patent Number, Date ...

Plant Patent Number	Date	"Inventor"	Marketed as	Mutated From	Assignee	Habit	Patern	Earlier	Color
90	Apr 3, 1934	Shotwell		Delicious		standard	less stripe	2 wk.	3-4 times
1278	May 18, 1954	Plough	Royalred¹⁸⁰⁵	Richared	C&O	standard	blush	10 d.	lighter
1411	Aug 23, 1955	Brauns	Red King¹⁸¹¹	Starking	Van Well	standard	stripe	2 wk.	more complete
1565	Feb 12, 1957	Bisbee	Starkrimson	Starking	Stark	spur	blush	"earlier"	similar
1805	Feb 3, 1959	Frazier & Jenkins		Starking	Elon J. Gilbert	standard	blush	10 d.	brighter
1811	Feb 17, 1959	Hamilton	Hamilton		Hamilton	standard	blush	2 wk.	darker
1822	Mar 24, 1959	Gilbert	Redspur	Starking	C&O	spur	blush	later	brighter
1916	Feb 23, 1960	Hutchinson	Top Red³⁵⁵⁶	Shotwell	C&O	standard	striped	2-3 wk.	darker
1930	Apr 5, 1960	Wood	Woods, Starkspur²⁶⁰⁶	Starking	Stark	spur	striped	1 wk.	deeper
2285	Sep 24, 1963	Gould		Red Delicious	Miller&Miller	standard	blush	"early"	more intense
2433	Aug 11, 1964	Gilbert Miller	Sturdyspur	Starking	Cons. Orch. Co	spur	blush	"early"	dark
2440	Aug 25, 1964	Frank Rypczynski	"Frank", Super Starking⁵⁵⁶⁹	Starking	Stark	standard	subdued stripes	30 d.	fuller
2606	Mar 15, 1966	Cooper		Starkrimson or Welspur		spur	stripe	10-14d.	more intense
2816	June 4, 1968	Trumbull	Oregon Spur⁴⁸¹⁹	Red King	Van Well	spur	stripe	2 wk.	darker
2956	Dec 23, 1969	Diede		Starking	Stark	standard			more intense
3025	Feb 2, 1971	Matson	Stark Earlibrite⁵⁵⁴⁷	Ryan Red	Stark	standard	blush	1 month	bright
3035	Mar 2, 1971	Maxam		Starking		standard	blush		deeper
3040	Apr 13, 1971	Norton		Vance		spur		2-3 wk.	brilliant
3485	Feb 19, 1974	Coke	Rose Red	Starking	Rose	spur	blush	from start	dark
3541	May 7, 1974	Pagnelli		Starking	Stark	spur	blush		brighter
3556	May 28, 1974	Ward	Early Red One⁴⁸³⁹	Brauns	Van Well	standard	stripe	4 wk.	darker blackish-purple
3557	May 28, 1974	Flanagan		Starking	Stark	spur	stripe	before Topred	brighter, lighter
3567	June 11, 1974	Slusarenko		unknown	Stark	standard	stripe	4 d. before #2440	red
3578	June 25, 1974	Campbell	Red Chief³⁵⁷⁸	Starkrimson	Hilltop	spur	stripe	"earlier"	deeper, brighter
4159	Nov. 29, 1977	Silvers	Silverspur	Hi Early	McCormick	spur	stripe	2 wk. before Hi Early	bright
4372	Jan 30, 1979	Craig		Oregon Spur		spur	stripe	2 wk.	darker, heavier
4587	Aug 12, 1980	Perleberg	Ace	Starkrimson or Oregon Red		spur	stripe	18 d.	bright but deep
4801	Jan 19, 1982	Garretson		Starking	Carlton	<spur / dwarf	blush		bright
4819	Feb 2, 1982	Green	Oregon Spur II⁶¹⁹⁰	Oregon Spur	Wells & Wade	spur	stripe	10 d.	dark
4839	Apr 20, 1982	Evans et al.	Scarlet Spur⁶¹⁹⁰	Oregon Spur	Van Well	spur	blush	2 wk.	red stem
4926	Nov 9, 1982	Coke&Smith	Super Clone^4926M	Starking	McCormick, Bountiful Ridge	spur, dwarfing	stripe	no change, late bloom	light
5334	Nov 13, 1984	Kemp	Top Spur⁵³³⁴	Starkrimson	C&O	spur	stripe	5-7 d.	deeper, brighter
5421	Mar 26, 1985	Hanners	Eve's Delight	Spokane Beauty		stripe			light
5472	May 21, 1985	Jenkins	Jenred,⁵⁴⁷² Starkspur,⁵⁴⁷² Ultrastripe⁵⁴⁷²	Oregon Spur	Stark	spur	stripe	15 d.	more consistent
5547	Sep 3, 1985	Hare	Hared,⁵⁵⁴⁷ Dixiered,⁵⁵⁴⁷ Starkspur⁵⁵⁴⁷	Oregon Spur	Stark	spur	blush	15-20 d.	dark
5569	Oct 8, 1985	Gonzalez	Rico⁷²³⁷	Sharp Red	Merleley & al.	standard	stripe	20 d.
6190	May 31, 1988	Sandidge	Super Chief	Red Chief		spur	stripe	18 d.	red stem
6702	Mar 28, 1989	Valle	Vallee Spur⁶⁷⁰²	Red Chief		spur	blush	2 wk.	dark red with bloom
7237	May 29, 1990	Sali	Sali⁷²³⁷	Redspur		semi-spur	blush	"earliest"	purple tinge
7928	Aug 4, 1992	Winkel	AW-164⁷⁹²⁸	Redchief	Inter-Plant Patent Marketing	spur	blush	5-10 d.	brighter
10,832	Mar 23, 1999	Deutscher	Cumberland Spur^10,832	Oregon Spur		spur	blush	10-14 d.	complete
14,757	May 4, 2004	Burchinal	Adams Apple, Burchinal Red Delicious^14,757	Oregon Spur II	Microsoft	spur	blush	immediately	more uniform, deeper, purple, bloom

Close

Well-known but unpatented sports include:

Chelan Red, which has been described as having oxblood red fruit
Hi Early
Houser
Mood,²⁴³³ or Starking, which colors ~2 wk. before "standard Delicious"¹⁴¹¹
Richared - brighter red than standard, blush, not stripe ¹²⁷⁸
Ryan
Sharp Red
Spokane Beauty
Wellspur

In 1997, the application for #4159 noted the "starchy and bland taste of some of the newer varieties."

The plant patent for #4926 promoted the sport as a dwarfing interstock, a dwarfing rootstock for pears, or to produce "crab apple" sized Delicious apples.

Epidendrum References

Dressler on subdividing Epidendrum: http://www.springerlink.com/content/x65562qp48721l67/

Epidendrum dendrobii

Quick facts Epidendrum dendrobii, Scientific classification ...

Epidendrum dendrobii
Scientific classification
Kingdom:	Plantae
(unranked):	Angiosperms
(unranked):	Monocots
Order:	Asparagales
Family:	Orchidaceae
Subfamily:	Epidendroideae
Tribe:	Epidendreae
Subtribe:	Laeliinae
Genus:	Epidendrum
Subgenus:	Pleuranthium Rchb.f. 1850
Species:	E. dendrobii
Binomial name
*Epidendrum dendrobii* Rchb.f. 1850
Synonyms
Epidendrum pileatum (Rchb.f.) Rchb.f. 1861

Close

Epidendrum dendrobii is a terrestrial species of reed-stemmed Epidendrum of the Orchidaceae which grows on steep slopes in tropical montane cloud forests of Cochabamba, Bolivia and Venezuela at altitudes near 2.6 km.

Description

E. dendrobii is a terrestrial, sympodial orchid with tall (~1.2 m.^[1]) slender stems without any swelling, covered with foliaceous sheaths, most tipped with long, acute, slightly keeled, distichous leaves^[2]. The inflorescenses are short (1.5 cm) lateral racemes, or sometimes (Reichenbach, 1861) panicles, carying six to eight waxy-textured flowers arising between spathaceous bracts. The sepals are somewhat broader than the petals. The lip is trilobate, with the lateral lobes larger than the median lobe. The callus consists of two lamina at the apex of the column, followed by three broad keels.

Taxonomic Quibbles According to Kew^[3] (In July, 2009), E. dendrobii and E. pileatum (the type species of the subgenus Pleuranthium) are the same species. Both H. G. Reichenbach, 1861 and Dodson & Vásquez, 1989, distinguish between E. dendrobii, with smaller yellowish flowers, and E. pileatum, with larger (> 1 cm) greenish flowers with each floral segment rolled backwards from the long axis.

[1]
C. Dodson & R. Vásquez, Icones Plantarum Tropicarum Series II: Orchids of Bolivia Plate 0333 "Epidendrum pileatum", Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis. 1989
[2]
H. G. Reichenbach "Orchides" in C. Müller, Ed. Walpers Annales Botanices Systematicae Tomus VI pp. 414-415. Berlin. 1861.
[3]
http://apps.kew.org/wcsp/

Place in category Epidendrum_Pleuranthium|dendrobii

Epidendrum anisatum

Epidendrum anisatum
Scientific classification
Kingdom:	Plantae
(unranked):	Angiosperms
(unranked):	Monocots
Order:	Asparagales
Family:	Orchidaceae
Subfamily:	Epidendroideae
Tribe:	Epidendreae
Subtribe:	Laeliinae
Genus:	Epidendrum
Subgenus:	E. subg.Amphiglottium
Section:	E. sect. Schistochila
Subsection:	E. subsect. Integra
Binomial name
*Epidendrum anisatum* La Llave & Lex.
Synonyms
see text

Category Epidendrum_Subtaxa

As mentioned in the lead article, the genus Epidendrum is quite large and varied. Many taxa have been removed over the centuries, and the work continues. An early attempt to divide up the genus (and not simply remove what did not belong) was published by Lindley.^[1] H. G. Reichenbach expanded on Lindley's work in his 1861 treatise "Orchides", in which he accepted and placed 374 Epidendrum species into thirteen subgenera^[2]; some have since been elevated to new genera, some taxa have been removed from Epidendrum, and some remain:

1. Epicladium Most of these are now in Cattleya or Guarianthe, with the exceptions of E. hastatum, E. boothianum, E. citrinum, and E. campylostaliy, which are now in Prosthechea.
2. Encyclium has been elevated to the genus Encyclia. Reichenbach listed four sections
E. sect. Holochila, with the description "Labellum integerrimum" (lip very undivided) E. sect. Sarcochila, with the description "Labellum apice ipso tridentatum, carnosum" (the fleshy lip with three teeth at the apex). The remaining two sections carried the collective description "labellum trilobum lobo medio membranaceo" (the lip with three lobes: the middle lobe membranaceous) E. sect. Sphaerochila, with the description "lobis lateralibus rotundatis, intermedio subconformi, nec majore" (rotund lateral lobes, the middle lobe smaller, or not larger) E. sect. Hymenochila, with the description "lobis lateralibus angustis, indermedio difformi saepius multo majore" (lateral lobes narrow, the middle lobe differing by being much more encircling)
3. Diacrium has been elevated to the genus Caularthron.
4. Hormidium has been elevated to generic rank by Withner and Harding^[3] but is recognized as part of Prosthechea by Kew^[4]
5. E. subg. Psilanthemum Klotzsch, with radical inflorescences, included Cattleya walkeriana and Epidendrum stamfordianum.
6. Aulizeum included many taxa which are now in Prosthechea
7. Osmophytym included many taxa which are now in Prosthechea
8. Lanium, from which Reichenbach 1861 removed both species.

The remaining subgenera carry the description "Caulis foliosus strictus"; they have often been known as the "reed stemmed Epidendrum" species.

9. E. subg. Spathium, described as "Spatha 1, magna" are characterized by the inflorescence erupting from a large, flattened spathe at the apex of the stem. Reichenbach did not subdivide this subgenus.
10. E. subg. Amphiglottium, described as "Spathae plures, imbricatae" (the peduncle covered from the base by many imbricating sheathes). Reichenbach listed three sections and three subsections on p. 373
E. sect. Polycladia described as "Flores vere paniculati" (inflorescence a true panicle) The remainder of the subtaxa of E. subg. Amphiglottium carry the collective description "Flores racemosi (raro in paniculam racemosam luxuriantes.)" (inflorescence a raceme, or rarely a panicle of luxuriant racemes) E. sect. Holochila described as "Labellum indivisum" (undivided lip) E. sect. Schistochila consists of three entries, under the collective description "Labellum lobatum" (lobate lip) E. subsect. Integra, spelled as Schistochila integra and described as "laciniis omnibus integris" (all of the lobes with smooth margins) The remaining subsections (the "lacerate" subsections) carry the additional collective description "laciniis laceria" (the lip margins lacerate) E. subsect. Carinata, spelled as Schistochila carinata and described as "lobo medio lamellato" (the midlobe with one or more keels) E. subsect. Tuberculata, spelled as Schistochila tuberculata and described as "lobo medio nuso basi bicalioso"
11. E. subg. Epidendrum, spelled as "Euepidendrum" and described as "Spatha o" (neither spathe nor sheath at the base of the peduncle). Reichenbach 1861 listed four sections and four subsections on p. 397—399
E. sect. Equitantia, described as "Folia equitantia" (leaves forming a fan). E. sect. Sarcophylla, without a description, but merely an attribution to "Rchb. fil." One species E. microphyllum. E. sect. Teretifolia, also without a description and with an attribution to "Rchb. fil." and a list of three species E. teres, E. karwinskii, and E. subulaatifolium E. sect. Planifolia, described as "Folia plana" (flat leaves), with four subsections E. subsect. Spathacea, spelled "Planifolia spathacea" and described as "bracteis spathaceis saepius ancipitibus" (the floral bracts forming spathes that surround the stems). The remaining subsections carry the additional collective description "bracteis depauparatis" (the floral bracts small) E. subsect. Umbellata, spelled "Planifolia umbellata" and described as "floribus umbellatis" (the inflorescence umbel-like). E. subsect. Racemosa, spelled "Planifolia racemosa" and described as "floribus racemosis" (the inflorescence a raceme) E. subsect. Paniculata, spelled "Planifolia paniculata" and described as "floribus paniculatis" (the inflorescence a panicle)
12. E. subg. Pleuranthium Rchb.f., described as "Inflorescentia laeralis" (lateral inflorescences).
13. Amblostoma Rchb.f., pp. 374-376 has been elevated to the genus Barkeria

Place in category Epidendrum

Cattleya subtaxa

Apple sports

Empire

By the year 2001, three mutant forms of Empire had been patented. None of them were mutants of mutants:

Date	"Inventor"	Marketed as	Assignee	Earlier	Color	Plant Patent Number
Mar 10, 1992	Teeple	Teeple Red Empire, Royal Empire	Cornell	no	redder	US plant patent 7820
Oct 20, 1992	Thome	TF808	Inter-Plant Patent Marketing	5—7 days	redder	US plant patent 8010
Feb 1, 2000	Crist	CB515, Crown Empire	Adams County Nursery	2.5 weeks	redder	US plant patent 11201

Cortland

The original Cortland variety, which produced apples which were 20—30% red,^[5] was not patented.

Date	"Inventor"	Marketed as	Mutated From	Assignee	Habit	Pattern	Earlier	Color	Plant Patent Number
Jan 19, 1982	LaMont	Lamont, Starkspur	standard	Stark Bro's Nursery	spur	striped	same	same	US plant patent 4800
Aug 30, 1983	Nicklin	Redcort	standard	Hilltop Nursery	standard	stiped	2 wk.	90% red	US plant patent 5095
Oct 7, 1997	Hartenhof	NS-911	standard	Adams County Nursery	standard	striped	same	red overall	US plant patent 10049

Fuji

Many sports (mutants) of the Fuji apple have been recognized and propagated. In addition to those that have remained unpatented, at least twenty have received US plant patents:

Date	"Inventor"	Marketed as	Mutated From	Assignee	Habit	Pattern	Earlier	Color	Plant Patent Number
Aug 29, 1989	Hiraragi	Yataka	Fuji	Makoto Okada	standard	stripe	1 Month	-	US plant patent 7001
Oct 6, 1992	Yahagi	Heisei Fuji, Beni Shogun^[6]	Yataka⁷⁰⁰¹	Nakajima Tenkoen	standard	solid	no	dark red	US plant patent 7997
Nov 17, 1992	Cooper	T.A.C.#114	Redsport Type 2	T.A.C.	spur	stripe	10—14 days	more brilliant red, 80—90%	US plant patent 8032
Sep 26, 1995	Fukuda	Tensei	Fuji	Fukushima Tenkoen	standard, larger	stripe	no	same	US plant patent 9298
Apr 16, 1996	Lynd	Fuji-Spike	Fuji	Lynd	spur	stripe	0—5 days	same	US plant patent 9508
Sep 24, 1996	Van Leuven	Myra	unknown red strain	C & O	standard	blush w/ subtle stripe	1 week	bright pink	US plant patent 9645
Dec 9, 1997	Auvil	Fuji 216	T.A.C.#114⁸⁰³²	Auvil	standard	blush	5—21 days	brighter red, 90—100%	US plant patent 10141
Mar 24, 1998	Coopr & Perkins	Fuji Compact T.A.C. #114	T.A.C.#114⁸⁰³²	T.A.C.	spur	same	same	same	US plant patent 10291
Jan 25, 2000	Van Leuven	Fiero	Yataka⁷⁰⁰¹	C & O	standard	indistinct stripe	7—10 days	more intense blush	US plant patent 11193
Sep 18, 2001	Snyder	Snyder	BC 2	Snyder	semi-spur	heavy stripe	same	same	US plant patent 12098
Nov 27, 2001	Torres	Triple E	BC 2	-	standard	85—100% blush	10—14 days	solid red	US plant patent 12219
Apr 16, 2002	Rankin	Rankin Red	Yakata⁷⁰⁰¹	Twin Springs Fruit Farm	standard	70—90% blush	5 days	more intense	US plant patent 12551
Nov. 11, 2003	Teague	Irene	BC 2	-	standard	solid	60 days	yellow	US plant patent 14299
Oct 26, 2004	Braun	Brak	Fuji	Kiku	standard	striped	earlier	ruby red	US plant patent 15261
Feb 21, 2006	Clevenger	Fugachee	Fuji	-	standard	70—90% blush	14 days before Fiero	-	US plant patent 16270
Jun 6, 2006	Banning	Banning Red	Desert Rose Fuji	Banning	standard	stripe	-	redder	US plant patent 16624
Aug 14, 2007	Lee, Edwards, Delugar	CABp	Nagafu 6	CABp 4	standard	stripe	-	"superior"	US plant patent 17914
Sep 11, 2007	Eppich	Eppich 2	T.A.C. #114⁸⁰³²	-	standard	blush with light stripe	unclear	yellow and red	US plant patent 18004
Apr 29, 2008	Braun	Fuji Fubrax	Fuji	Kiku SRL	standard	dark ruby red stripes and blush	late	green-yellow	US plant patent 18761
Jul 29, 2008	Leis, Mazzola	Fujiko	Nagafu 12	Consorzio Italians Vivaisti	standard	diffused	no	more intense red	US plant patent 19054

Unpatented Fuji mutants include:

BC 2
Desert Rose Fuji
Nagafu 2
Nagafu 6
Nagafu 12
Redsport Type 1
Redsport Type 2

Gala

Many sports of Gala have been selected, mostly for increased red color, including the popular Royal Gala. The original cultivar produced fruit with orange stripes and a partial orange blush over a yellow background. Since then, several un-patented sports have been recognized. Additionally, more than twenty sports have received US plant patents:

Date	"Inventor"	Marketed as	Mutated From	Assignee	Habit	Pattern	Earlier	Color	Plant Patent Number
Oct 15, 1974	McKenzie	Gala	-	Stark	standard	partial blush	-	yellow	US plant patent 3637
Oct 4, 1977	Ten Hove	Royal Gala, Tenroy	Gala³⁶³⁷	Stark	standard	stripe	-	red	US plant patent 4121
May 10, 1988	Creech	Scarlet Gala^[7]	Kidd's D-8³⁶³⁷	C & 0	standard	blush	-	scarlet	US plant patent 6172
Aug 1, 1989	Kiddle	Galaxy	Tenroy⁴¹²¹	Stark	standard	stripe	earlier	intense red	US plant patent 6955
Dec 18, 1990	Cooper	Treco Spur Red Gala No. 42, Regal	Auvil	Oregon Rootstock	spur	stripe	-	red	US plant patent 7396
Jul 16, 1991	Fulford	Fulford	Kidd³⁶³⁷		standard	blush	-	bright red	US plant patent 7589
Mar 1, 1994	Olsen	Obrogala, UltraRed	Tenroy⁴¹²¹	Stark	standard	stripe	2-4 days	redder	US plant patent 8621
Apr 5, 1994	Waliser	Waliser Gala	Tenroy⁴¹²¹	Waliser	standard	stripe	10 days	bright red	US plant patent 8673
May 10, 1994	Hill	Applewaites	Kidd's³⁶³⁷		standard	blush	2-3 days	more complete red	US plant patent 8720
Nov 5, 1996	Olsen	Olsentwo Gala, Pacific Gala	Royal Gala⁴¹²¹		standard	stripe	5-10 days	distinguishably different	US plant patent 9681
Sep 2 1997	Brookfield	Baigent	Royal Gala⁴¹²¹	Brookfield	standard	stripe	extremely early	bright red	US plant patent 10016
Nov 11 1997	Gale	Gale Gala	Royal Gala⁴¹²¹	Van Well	standard	stripe	3 weeks	more complete	US plant patent 10114
Jun 23, 1998	Fackler	Big Red Gala	Kidd's³⁶³⁷	Protree	standard	stripe	-	same	US plant patent 10458
Mar 30, 1999	Simmons	Simmons	Imperial	Peace Valley	standard	stripe	21 days	brighter red	US plant patent 10840
Jan 18, 2000	Stiekema	Stiekema 1	Obragala⁸⁶²¹		standard	blush	-	red	US plant patent 11182
Apr 11, 2000	McSpadden, Jr	Caitlin	Tenroy⁴¹²¹	Stark	standard	stripe	"earlier"	-	US plant patent 11348
Aug 13, 2002	Black	Harry Black	Kidd's³⁶³⁷	International Plant Management	standard	stripe	5 wk. later	-	US plant patent 12842
Apr 29, 2003	Banning	Banning Gala	Imperial		standard	stripe	-	intense red blush, darker stripe	US plant patent 13753
Jan 6, 2004	Smith	Smith gala	Tenroy⁴¹²¹		standard	stripe	-	yellow	US plant patent 14448
May 4, 2004	Weaver	Weaver	Fulford⁷⁵⁸⁹	Adams County Nursery	more compact	blush	-	bright red	US plant patent 14752
Jan 4, 2005	Ligonniere	Dalitoga	Imperial	SNC Elaris	standard	stripe	3 wk.	yellow	US plant patent 15465
Aug 15, 2006	Burkitt	Burkitt Gala	Tenroy⁴¹²¹	BMA Trust	standard	stripe	10 d.	completely red	US plant patent 17013
Feb 26, 2008	McDonald	El Niño	Royal⁴¹²¹		standard	intense dark red stripe		bright red	US plant patent 18512
Jul 8 2008	McLaughlin	McLaughlin Gala	Kidd's³⁶³⁷		standard		4—6 d.	yellow	US plant patent 19007
Dec 30, 2008	Fankhauser	Alvnia	Gala	Fankhauser	standard	stripes	"earlier"	red, > 95A% coverage	US plant patent 19604
Apr 14, 2009	Richard	Galaval	Galaxy⁶⁹⁵⁵	Pepinieres du Valois	standard	blush	-	intense dark purple brown	US plant patent 19909

Unpatented varieties include: Auvil, Imperial

Unpatented varieties include: Auvil

Winesap

Date	"Inventor"	Marketed as	Mutated From	Assignee	Habit	Pattern	Earlier	Color	Plant Patent Number
									US plant patent

Bartlett

Date	"Inventor"	Marketed as	Mutated From	Assignee	Habit	Flavor	Texture	Color	Plant Patent Number
Jul 1, 1947	Moritz	Max-Red Bartlett	Bartlett	MacKelvie	standard	sweeter	finer	red	US plant patent 741
Dec 27, 1977	Crisafulli		Bartlett		semi-dwarf	good		red blush	US plant patent 4169
Apr 14, 1998	Biehn	Cinnamon	Bartlett		standard	sweeter		russet	US plant patent 10325
Feb 26, 2008	Lowry	Carolina Gold	Bartlett	Associated Fruit	standard	more tart		russet	US plant patent 18515

Date	Originator	Marketed as	Parent	Other Parent	Plant Patent Number
Aug 27, 1974	Griggs	California	Max Red Bartlett⁷⁴¹	Comice	US plant patent 3599
Aug 9, 1988	Reimer	Reimer	Max Red Bartlett⁷⁴¹	Comice	US plant patent 6245
Jan 30, 2007	White	Prem2P	Max Red Bartlett⁷⁴¹	Nijisseiki	US plant patent 17387
Apr 17, 2007	Hart	Prem1P	Max Red Bartlett⁷⁴¹	Nijisseiki	US plant patent 17624