User:Jeanpetr

1. How reliable is the source of claim?
2. Is the source always make similar claims?
3. Has the claim been independently verified?
4. Does the claim fit in with how things are known to work?
5. Are there good possible counters to the claim?
6. Is the evidence presented a biased subset?
7. Is the claim being pushed without empiricism and logic?
8. Is there positive evidence provided of the claim?
9. Does the claim explain and predict more than current theories?
10. Are there personal beliefs or agendas driving a claim?

• Rita Demontis ,Toronto Sun
• ELIZABETH BAIRD, Special to QMI Agency
• Tracey Tyler thestar
• Sarah Brown globe
• tmd

${\displaystyle NLM(x)={\hat {u}}(x)={\frac {\sum _{x'\in \Omega }w(x,x')u(x')}{\sum _{x'\in \Omega }w(x,x')}}}$

${\displaystyle w(x,x')=e^{-{\frac {\lVert P(x)-P(x')\rVert _{2}}{h^{2}}}}}$

${\displaystyle S_{i}(x)=(s_{1},s_{2},...s_{n}),i=1...n}$

${\displaystyle Aniso(x)={\frac {max(S_{i}(x))-min(S_{i}(x))}{max(S_{i}(x))}}}$