User:SCHolar44

Wikipedia editor From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[1]

Welcome  :-)

Hello! You're reading the userpage of SCHolar44. It contains many pieces of information on good practice that I have needed during the past 19 years as a Wikipedia contributor; I put them here because I have a longstanding, moderate memory impairment. You are very welcome to make use of the information. Please note that some content, such as copyright information, has an Australian context and may not be relevant to other contexts.

Userpages are normally edited only by the user. I appreciate comments being left on User talk:SCHolar44, especially if you spot something that could be improved.

Communicating with me

Subpages to this User page

My sandbox and other pages that I use when developing articles simultaneously:

SandboxSub-page 1Sub-page 2Sub-page 3Sub-page 4ClerestorySub-page 6Sub-page 7Yinkanie

Each of these has a Talk page for comments and queries about the article content.

More information Why I'm a Wikipedian ...
Why I'm a Wikipedian

I first became involved in writing for Wikipedia, in 2007, when I was impressed that Wikipedia offered a unique opportunity to help to democratise knowledge. This had followed the newly negotiated Australia–United States Free Trade Agreement that among other things required Australia to increase the period covered by copyright to align with that of the United States – a major impediment to scholarship. Wikipedia exemplified the opposite of that development.

Skills and experience that I utilise as a Wikipedia contributor include:

  • utilising an extensive background in science, engineering and strategic management consulting
  • distilling long, complex research project reporting into brief text for non-specialist readers
  • writing high-level policy and strategic plans
  • drafting legislation
  • tutoring senior managers in advanced business writing
  • preparing or editing PR material, speeches and media scripts
  • practising some skills in graphic design and image editing.

These are underpinned by a life-long love of studying languages (my native English and others) and the processes of logical thinking; and tertiary studies that include English. Reflecting this, I've been a longstanding executive member of an editors' society.

In some subject areas, I start writing Wikipedia articles after engaging one or more colleagues expert in the subject but who are not interested in writing for Wikipedia – sometimes because of the heavy citation obligations and/or the need to learn a form of html, and sometimes because of difficulties they have had with self-appointed "editing police". They make a real difference by contributing advice, sources and suitable reference material, and sometimes they review and comment on my drafts. We all enjoy this collaboration – and they especially enjoy not having to jump the hurdles of writing for Wikipedia.  :-)

Additionally I am keen to dig out and include analogue (papyrus-based) reference material; I fear that before long, not many people will be prepared to search the vast stores of knowledge created before the digital world emerged.

What have I left out? The sheer joy of digging out facts and making them accessible to anyone who cares to read our articles. If you're reading this, you know about it too, and the good will and collegiality that makes Wikipedia work brilliantly.

Close



 ©TOC  Tags  Cvt 


Sources of help

Help directory

See the Help Directory for the directory of Wikipedia's how-to and information pages, alongside other related administrative pages in the Wikipedia and Help namespaces.

Help desk

Wikipedia: Help desk

Wikimedia Commons: Help desk

[All pages with prefix (User namespace)]

Frequently asked questions


More FAQ topics

Publishing

Article structure

Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout

Manual of style

WP:MOS

or

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style

Reliable sources (guidelines on)

Wikipedia:Reliable sources

"Wikipedia requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations."

Meaning of "published"

See Wikipedia:Published.

"All reliable sources must be both published and accessible to at least some people."

"For Wikipedia's purposes, published means any source that is made available to the public in some form. The term published is most commonly associated with text materials, either in traditional printed format or online. However, audio, video, and multimedia materials that have been recorded then broadcast, distributed, or archived may also meet the necessary criteria to be considered a reliable source. Like text sources, media sources must be normally produced by a third party and be properly cited, although self-published sources are also considered "published" for Wikipedia's purposes and can sometimes be used in articles. Additionally, an archived copy of the media must exist and be available to the general public. ... The definition also encompasses material such as documents in publicly accessible archives, inscriptions on monuments, gravestones, etc., that are available for anyone to see." [CH: Similarly, signs -- {{cite sign}}.]

Self-published and user-generated sources

Content from websites whose content is largely user-generated is generally unacceptable. Sites with user-generated content include personal websites, personal and group blogs (excluding newspaper and magazine blogs), content farms, Internet forums, social media sites, fansites, video and image hosting services, most wikis and other collaboratively created websites.

See tag for user-generated content here.

Self-published sources are largely not acceptable. Self-published books and newsletters, personal pages on social networking sites, tweets, and posts on Internet forums are all examples of self-published media. Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established expert on the subject matter, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable, independent publications.

Verifiability, not truth

See essays: Verifiability, not truth and Truth.

Advice to new editors

Colin Fine prepared a template to give his take on this subject: {{User:ColinFine/PractiseFirst}}

-- which renders as:

My earnest advice to new editors is to not even think about trying to create an article until you have spent several weeks - at least - learning about how Wikipedia works by making improvements to existing articles. Once you have understood core policies such as verifiability, neutral point of view, reliable, independent sources, and notability, and experienced how we handle disagreements with other editors (the Bold, Revert, Discuss cycle), then you might be ready to read your first article carefully, and try creating a draft. If you don't follow this advice but try to create an article without this preparation, you are likely to have a frustrating and disappointing experience with Wikipedia.

(There's nothing to prevent anyone creating their own template. Since I use Typinator text expander a lot, I just use that.)

Editing-management processes

New page

For Wikimedia Commons, use the Upload Wizard page.

For Wikipedia, this can be used to create an article:

User subpage, creating

From Wikipedia:User pages#Creating a subpage:

In the Wikipedia search box type User:SCHolar44/subpageN <== (Where N is the numeral of the next page -- 1 to start with) and press ENTER. This will bring you to a page with the title User:SCHolar44/subpageN. Now click the CREATE button next to the Wikipedia search box and your new subpage will be created for you. Click on EDIT, enter a few test words (perhaps a mention of what you'll be putting on it) and click the "Publish changes" button. You may also wish to tick "Watch this page" and/or "This is a minor edit". You will notice that, differently from your User page, the subpage contains a backlink to your User page.

On my User page I prefer to have a linked list of subpages, so I type in the User page: [[/subpage1]] – contains a draft article on '''[The title in bold]''', which renders as:

/subpage1 – contains a draft article on [The title in bold]

Page information (including visitor details)

From the page on which you want information, click "Page information", at the bottom of "Tools", in the sidebar.

See also Pageviews Analysis -- queries include User talk, Template talk in addition to mainspace articles, and comparison of pageviews across multiple pages.

User statistics

This User page → on right: Contributions → Scroll to the very bottom → Edit statistics.

Notice when editing is in progress

To signify that a page is actively undergoing a major edit, see Template:In use.

Put the code at the top of the article -- or section in the case of {{In use|section}}.

{{In use|time=~~~~~}} will render as:

To "reserve" a more specific length of time and/or provide a message, you can use the text parameter to tell visitors of your intentions:

{{In use|time or other message}}

Example: {{In use|(most likely) 24 hours from {{CURRENTTIME}} (UTC) {{CURRENTDAYNAME}}}}

-- which renders as:

Redirect (Wikipedia)

Wikipedia:Redirect

With a movefile right, just use the "Move & Replace" tab as you would normally do to a regular page.

Or enter the title to be created here (from Wikipedia:How_to_make_a_redirect):

My most used category is [[Category:Redirects from alternative names|Redirects from alternative names]]. To add a redirect to this category, place {{Rcat shell|{{R from alternative name}}}} on the second new line (i.e., skip a line) below #REDIRECT [[Target page name]]. See also: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names).

Redirect (Commons)

See Commons:File renaming

To move a [re-named] page, with a movefile right, just use the "Move & Replace" tab as you would normally do to a regular page; otherwise see Commons:File renaming#How to rename a file.

To create a Redirect in Commons (not a Category redirect -- see below) from a commonly used search term to an existing article:

In a Commons page (e.g. my User Page but anywhere will do, temporarily), in Edit mode, type -- in double square brackets -- the Redirect term you want to have, then click "Show Preview". Since the page does not exist, the link appears in red . Click on it to create the page (click "Leave page", which will cancel the page you've been on). Then in the new page, in Edit mode, enter):

  1. REDIRECT [[name of the target page, preceded by "File:"]]

Click the Preview button to check all is correct. In the Edit summary, type in e.g. Redirect from common search term. Un-tick "Watch this page" and click Publish page. Check that the link works.

If it is a Category redirect, type the Redirect term you want to have and place it within double square brackets, preceded by a colon and the word "Category" – this prevents the redirect appearing in this category – then follow with the name of the existing category page.

#REDIRECT [[Category:Name of the existing target page]]

Delete the temporary article name that you put in square brackets.

Reaching consensus – the BRD cycle

Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle

"The BOLD, revert, discuss cycle (BRD) is an optional method of reaching consensus. It can be useful for identifying objections, keeping discussion moving forward and helping to break deadlocks. In other situations, you may have better success with alternatives to this approach. Care and diplomacy should be exercised. Some editors will see any reversion as a challenge, so be considerate and patient."

Dispute resolution

WP:DR

or

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution

Reverting

See Help:Reverting.

Vandalism

See Template:Uw-vandalism1 for various levels of severity of warning.

Request deletion of a Commons page

Click the "Delete this page" link in the sidebar.

See (in Wikimedia Commons): Nominate for deletion. (Remember I have moving rights in Commons.)

For deletion policy for articles in Wikipedia, see: Deletion process

For extending the period over which a nominated deletion article (in Wikipedia) is discussed, see: Relisting discussions.

Writing

Categories

Citations

Tips and solutions

Useful wiki markup

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI