User:Zenryzap

Descriptivism over Prescriptivism

Over-editing over under-editing

I live in America and thus I have a western perspective that will always be present.

I’m neither left wing nor right wing.

I am strongly anti-AI.

I believe that individual cultures and languages should be preserved as long as possible.

`

`

I will— often— forget; (punctuation) mark’s (…).

I can be over enthusiastic about small things, the first 20ish edits I made were so that I could edit the Charles III page to add that he’s agnatically a Glücksburg, and when I finally could I added a huge section about it and such which was just way way too much. Thankfully someone with a level head reverted it.

I can be a little loose about sourcing when it’s something I don’t necessarily care about, though if I care about something I will care about sourcing. I’ve been following a small Scandinavian content creator for 3 years while periodically asking her about an article she wrote 4 years ago that is still the only source on wether or not Wilhelm II actually held the title of Burgrave of Nuremberg or if that was just a joking thing that some people called him because he stayed there.

1. 1914 in Sweden, greatly expanded

2. Rudolf Reschreiter, Translated and expanded

3. List of reptiles of Malta, Written

4. Giuseppe Garibaldi, added a section

5. AquaLoop, organized

6. Louis Charles Delescluze, updated grave photo after my trip to Paris

7. Positivist calendar, article revamp

Apart from that I tend to just read wikipedia a lot and so I’ll make wording tweaks and changes here and there for fun. If I’m bored I’ll review recent edits.