User talk:1Qadri1

Hi 1Qadri1! I noticed that you recently made an edit and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 23:29, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you 😊 1Qadri1 (talk) 23:50, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Husayn ibn Ali when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 02:45, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

undo it, I'm fixing 1Qadri1 (talk) 02:47, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

You need to preview your edits BEFORE you save. You are breaking the Infobox repeatedly. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 02:59, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

Okay 1Qadri1 (talk) 03:00, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

have patience pls 1Qadri1 (talk) 03:00, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi 1Qadri1! I noticed that you've made several edits in order to restore your preferred version of an article. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you're aware of Wikipedia's edit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you're doing is justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages in order to try to reach a consensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement, please use one of the dispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors' changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. Thank you. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 20:12, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Hasan ibn Ali. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 11:55, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

okay 1Qadri1 (talk) 11:57, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

The issue is that no one has responded to me on the talk page—editors are simply removing content or titles without discussing it, even though I have provided a sahih hadith where the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: “Al-Hasan and Al-Husain are the chiefs of the youths of Paradise.

https://sunnah.com/tirmidhi:3768

I’m fully willing to discuss the matter and reach consensus, but it becomes difficult when others revert without opening any conversation. I’ve asked for dialogue and clarification, and I would appreciate if editors could discuss their concerns on the talk page so we can resolve this properly according to Wikipedia policies. 1Qadri1 (talk) 12:05, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Since nobody has replied yet, I have spelled out the specific policy issues there: WP:NOR and WP:Primary sources. —C.Fred (talk) 12:19, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

According to the Encyclopaedia of Islam (a high-quality secondary academic source), Hasan ibn Ali was a claimant to the caliphate.

https://referenceworks.brill.com/display/entries/EIEO/COM-0272.xml?rskey=surR3t&result=2&Tab-menu=abstract 1Qadri1 (talk) 13:04, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, 1Qadri1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome!  ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 20:11, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:1Qadri1 reported by User:Apaugasma (Result: ). Thank you. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 17:06, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Undid revision because the 5th Caliph of the Rashidun Caliphate was already stated. It was not added by me and was supported by sources in the article.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hasan_ibn_Ali&oldid=1321645660 1Qadri1 (talk) 17:16, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

https://archive.org/details/TheHistoryOfTheKhalifahs#:~:text=I%20have%20continued,Mu%20c%20awiyah 1Qadri1 (talk) 17:17, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

The edit warring concerns your continued reversions of multiple editors on a subject that is under discussion on the talk page. It doesn't matter whether what you revert was originally an addition or a removal from the article. The point is that you are reverting to your favored revision while you should have been discussing and gaining consensus on the talk page.

Apart from the edit warring, you also need to stop pointing to primary sources to support your proposed changes. Medieval and religious sources are not considered reliable for Wikipedia's purposes. What we need is modern, secular, academic, secondary or tertiary sources. If you want to help improving Wikipedia, it is crucial that you familiarize yourself with such sources. Thanks for taking this into consideration, ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 17:47, 18 November 2025 (UTC)