User talk:Abandeali

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

More information Views/Day, Quality ...

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
17		Bernard Etxepare (talk)	Add sources
40		Désiré-Joseph Mercier (talk)	Add sources
11		Osaka Dojima Exchange (talk)	Add sources
596		Futures contract (talk)	Add sources
28		Amarkant (talk)	Add sources
5		McMillin Observatory (talk)	Add sources
79		MF Global (talk)	Cleanup
135		Overpopulation (talk)	Cleanup
19		108th Wing (talk)	Cleanup
1,362		Price of oil (talk)	Expand
468		Credit default swap (talk)	Expand
1,697		Iran national football team (talk)	Expand
729		Keith Hernandez (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,238		Colon (punctuation) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
78		Atomic Train (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
25		TwoMorrows Publishing (talk)	Merge
107		Argentine passport (talk)	Merge
13		Dutch Antilles Express (talk)	Merge
390		Sprite (lightning) (talk)	Wikify
188		Biodiversity loss (talk)	Wikify
26		Microtypography (talk)	Wikify
3		Lloyd, Carr & Company (talk)	Orphan
9		Sohan Lal Commodity Management (talk)	Orphan
6		Sentinel Management Group (talk)	Orphan
16		The Great Salad Oil Swindle (talk)	Stub
7		Denis Rousseau (talk)	Stub
8		Mangalsen (talk)	Stub
11		Norman Charles Miller (talk)	Stub
3		Hiram Perkins (talk)	Stub
7		Steve Rodriguez (skateboarder) (talk)	Stub

Close

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:22, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive: Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process? On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed. Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points! Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talk page.
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Salad oil scandal has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ActuallyElite -- ActuallyElite (talk) 19:47, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

Thankyou Abandeali for completing the GA review for aquatic locomotion, it is greatly appreciated. At the moment, we're asking new reviewers to share their experience with the process, so we can see how it can be improved and made more welcoming. We'd welcome any thoughts you can share in the survey here. Whonting (talk) 00:17, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

That's really helpful feedback, thanks. There is some guidance on spotchecking at WP:SPOTCHECK, although contains a lot of information. In all honesty, you did well doing a spotcheck and in how you did it; one thing you may find helpful in the future is the WP:VERACITY to structure your comments there. I hear you on templates, most experienced reviewers don't use them beyond a progress indicator for exactly the constraints on back and forth: you can see an example of how some use it at Talk:Siderian/GA1. Let me know if you have any questions. Best, Whonting (talk) 01:40, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

On 21 July 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Salad oil scandal, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that so much fake inventory was created during the salad oil scandal that one storage facility claimed to store more salad oil than existed in the entire country? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Salad oil scandal. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (Salad oil scandal), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 12:04, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 10,830 views (902.5 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of July 2026 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:29, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Hi Abandeali,

There is an ongoing Request for Comment (RfC) at Wikipedia:Good article nominations/August 2026 RfC, which you may be interested in because in the past year, you have nominated or reviewed more than one good article nomination. This message has also been sent to all subscribers to the Good Article Gazette. The RfC contains many proposals (33 at the time of writing), which are split into the following categories: nominators, reviewers, reviews, volunteer roles, reviewing initiatives, and others. However, you are more than welcome to add any proposals of your own that you wish to put to the community.

By the end of September, all the proposals will have been closed by an uninvolved editor, either as a consensus for one of the options or with no consensus. At this point, editors will be invited again to develop these proposals into coherent policy and implement them.

Thank you for your contributions to the good articles project, and I look forward to your input! (in solidarity), JacobTheRox^{(talk|contributions)} 16:02, 11 August 2026 (UTC)