User talk:Abductive

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

More information Views/Day, Quality ...

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
17		ALTV (talk)	Add sources
149		Leopold II, Grand Duke of Tuscany (talk)	Add sources
644		Ford E-Series (talk)	Add sources
233		Grey crowned crane (talk)	Add sources
22		Angulate tortoise (talk)	Add sources
2,511		Latin America (talk)	Add sources
56		Bismarckia (talk)	Cleanup
3		Balanococcus cordylinidis (talk)	Cleanup
636		Wenceslaus IV of Bohemia (talk)	Cleanup
251		Cyperaceae (talk)	Expand
726		Woodlouse (talk)	Expand
16		Scott McDaniel (talk)	Expand
198		Ukrainian resistance in Russian-occupied Ukraine (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
124		Worship of heavenly bodies (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
64		Glossary of firefighting (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
134		Scops owl (talk)	Merge
182		Student council (talk)	Merge
85		Interstate 20 in South Carolina (talk)	Merge
140		Wildfires in 2026 (talk)	Wikify
240		Russian strikes against Ukrainian infrastructure (talk)	Wikify
240		Litigation involving Jeffrey Epstein (talk)	Wikify
3		Maryam Jafarkhani Kermani (talk)	Orphan
4		Great Jami' Mosque of Singaraja (talk)	Orphan
3		Jiufeng, Shaanxi (talk)	Orphan
3		Phippsia (talk)	Stub
6		Hulsea algida (talk)	Stub
55		Saccharum spontaneum (talk)	Stub
4		United States House Agriculture Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticulture (talk)	Stub
14		Vito Dumas (talk)	Stub
5		× Pucciphippsia (talk)	Stub

Close

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:33, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive: Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process? On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed. Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points! Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talk page.
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

I see that you've made it onto ANI. I hope you don't get too stressed (like @BrownHairedGirl). Remember that it's always okay to apologize, take a cooldown, or even a small to medium (or even large, although we (the Wikipedia community) don't want you to be gone for too long) Wikibreak.

I hope this message finds you in good health,

Sincerely, Wikipedian12512 (Talking is fine | contribs) 20:28, 27 May 2026 (UTC) (signed)

• Thank you for your concern and your kindness. Abductive (reasoning) 08:41, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi Abductive, I would love to get rid of the flags at 2026 Venezuela earthquakes but I can't see a directly relevant section in MOS:FLAG to justify such action, is there something I'm missing? Mikenorton (talk) 09:59, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

• Well, there is MOS:FLAGCRUFT, with the term "cruft" indicating absolute withering contempt, and WP:QUOTECRUFT, and MOS:USEPROSE. In addition, when editors raise the issue on an articles' talk page, the consensus almost always ends up being to prosify. Abductive (reasoning) 13:02, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

• Thanks, the sooner the better, but, in a few weeks to months time, there will be a lot less interest and it should be possible to remove where necessary. condense and prosify. Mikenorton (talk) 16:56, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

The third round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 28 June at 23:59 (UTC). As a reminder, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, while peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 3 will advance to round 4 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 3 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; eight scored over 500; and thirteen scored over 300. The top three contestants had at least one featured article (two of them with two apiece). The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

• MCE89 (submissions) with 1567 points, mainly from good and featured articles about Australian people and geography, as well as some article reviews
• Bgsu98 (submissions) with 1547 points, mainly from good articles, featured articles, featured lists, and a good topic about figure skating, along with 20 article reviews
• Reconrabbit (submissions) with 1004 points, mainly from a high-multiplier featured article on European rabbit and several good articles, DYKs, and reviews
• A.Cython (submissions) with 1004 points, mainly from good articles about warfare, along with 22 article reviews
• Generalissima (submissions) with 859 points, mainly from good and featured articles about rivers and East Asian topics

The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 12 featured articles, 12 featured lists, 7 featured-topic articles, 117 good articles, 74 good-topic articles and more than 30 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 13 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 180 reviews. The tournament points table has been updated.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed in Round 4. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Redirects you have created have been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 July 22 § Stoneless avocado until a consensus is reached. Mathguy2718 (talk) 17:05, 22 July 2026 (UTC)