User talk:Akshadev

This is Akshadev's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives (index): 1, 2: 5 days

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

This user is aware of the designation of the following as contentious topics:

the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups
the Arab–Israeli conflict
pseudoscience and fringe science
complementary and alternative medicine

They should not be given alerts for those areas.

Please don't template me! Everybody makes mistakes, and this user finds user warning templates impersonal and disrespectful. If there's something you'd like to say, please take a moment to write a comment below in your own words.

Whoops!

Hiya, I just reverted an edit on this page, as I thought you had removed the content.

I now realise you did not remove the content, and was only shifting it.

Sorry about that.

Cheers, Randomdude123459 | Talk | Contribs | 07:37, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

@Randomdude123459: No worries, it's natural to react like that. It's totally okay! Have a pleasant day/night. Happy editing and regards! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^🗿 07:39, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

You too!

Randomdude123459 | Talk | Contribs | 07:40, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello Akshadev! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Created articles' list, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:11, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Astrobase (December 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Astrobase and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 11:42, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello Akshadev! The thread you created at the Teahouse, GA review, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello Akshadev! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Background color, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:03, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Safaribags moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Safaribags. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. AlphaCore talk 19:48, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi @AlphaCore: When I try to add any source, a pop-up appears saying "This source is blocked." Also, Wikipedia doesn't seem to have any permissible sources available regarding this article. Could you please tell me how I can add a reliable source? – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^{𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔} 05:40, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

@Akshadev Try to add only reliable sources. Refer: WP:CITING and WP:RS.

You can refer WP:ICTFSOURCES for reliability of common Indian sources. Thank you AlphaCore talk 08:10, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

@AlphaCore: I know all this. My question is where can I find reliable sources regarding the topic of Safaribags? – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ ^{𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔} 08:16, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

@Akshadev Refer: WP:RSSE AlphaCore talk 11:10, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Safaribags (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheObsidianGriffon was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Safaribags and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheObsidianGriffon (talk) 02:25, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Akshadev! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheObsidianGriffon (talk) 02:25, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on AFC Nations League

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page AFC Nations League, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:00, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles