User talk:Andeubn

Hi Andeubn! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Swan and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. MossOnALog^Talk 18:52, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Amigao. I noticed that you recently made an edit in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Amigao (talk) 18:14, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in the Russo-Ukrainian War. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. Additionally, the following restriction(s) apply to this topic area: Only extended-confirmed editors may make edits related to the topic area, though editors who are not extended-confirmed may post constructive comments and make edit requests related to articles within the topic area on article talk pages. Should disruption occur on article talk pages, administrators may take enforcement actions against disruptive editors and/or apply page protection on article talk pages. However, non-extended-confirmed editors may not make edits to internal project discussions related to the topic area, even on article talk pages. Internal project discussions include, but are not limited to, Articles for deletion nominations, WikiProjects, requests for comment, requested moves, and noticeboard discussions. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:02, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia requires neutral editing, particularly when editing WP:BLP articles. Any repeat of edits such as diff (or repeat of opiniated edit summaries) will lead to a block. Johnuniq (talk) 01:29, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to God. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 19:00, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Every one on earth may have their own opinion POV, whether book-authors, theologians, even I. Be open-minded. Wikipedia is for collaborative ones. Your collaboration would be helpful if you can make it brief (when your own POV that mine is too long) and please talk to available talk page Talk:God because we can discuss later on topic with others. Peace be upon us. Andeubn (talk) 19:13, 21 February 2026 (UTC)