User talk:Anonymous FASE

Hi Anonymous FASE! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:

Search the Task Center

Happy editing! I am bad at usernames (talk · contribs) 19:41, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi 👋 thank you for the warm welcome! I appreciate it and look forward to contributing constructively to Wikipedia Anonymous FASE (talk) 19:44, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello Anonymous FASE. Have you edited under any accounts previously, before this one? 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 22:43, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

I have edited in the past under another account which is no longer in use. At this point, I’m focusing on editing responsibly and in good faith with this account. Anonymous FASE (talk) 02:41, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

And i think wikipedia allows alternative accounts only for legitimate purposes, but I understand that each editor must maintain a single editorial voice. I’m focused on following policies correctly with this account. Anonymous FASE (talk) 02:56, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Was your previous account put under any editing restrictions or sanctions? E.g. a block? 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 02:58, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

I don’t think it’s necessary to go into details here. I prefer not to discuss any previous accounts and am focused on editing constructively and in line with Wikipedia’s policies using this account. Anonymous FASE (talk) 03:01, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

If you are under any blocks, or other editing restrictions, you should not be editing under a new account. Please appeal those first. If not, I wish you luck with your clean start. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 03:25, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

I acknowledge the policy and appreciate the guidance. I have made mistakes in the past, but I have also made genuine efforts to contribute in good faith. I hope those efforts can be considered as I continue working constructively under this account. THANK YOU FOR ASKING 🙂 Anonymous FASE (talk) 03:30, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Anything else to ask? I think this has been sufficiently addressed. I’m going to remove this thread now. If there is anything further that needs clarification, please let me know. Anonymous FASE (talk) 03:19, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 00:10, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

what? Anonymous FASE (talk) 00:26, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

are you stupid are what? Anonymous FASE (talk) 00:27, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anonymous FASE (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I respectfully request a review of this block.

Regarding possible account misuse. I want to clarify that I am not intentionally evading any active block, nor am I operating multiple accounts for abusive or deceptive purposes.

If there is a technical or historical connection that raised concern, I am willing to cooperate fully to resolve it. My recent edits were made in good faith, focused on article improvement, sourcing, and deletion discussions in line with Wikipedia policy.

I request an opportunity to continue contributing constructively under appropriate oversight if needed.

Thank you for your time and consideration. Anonymous FASE (talk) 01:03, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. Unambiguous. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 01:19, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.