User talk:AsianTiele

Welcome!

Hello, AsianTiele, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 14:39, 6 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi Isabelle! Thank you for welcoming me! I will definitely check out the help you provided me. AsianTiele (talk) 14:45, 6 September 2025 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

While the above notice does not imply any fault on your part, I would note that opening a response at NPOVN to a civil inquiry with It is deeply concerning to see yet another manipulative and obstructive response to well-sourced contributions is not going to end well for you. Focus on the substance of the content dispute in question, not other editors' behavior. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:48, 6 September 2025 (UTC)

Administrators' Noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:AsianTiele not understanding SYNTH and possibly using an LLM in discussion. Truthnope (talk) 23:58, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

@AsianTiele: The problem is that walls-of-text like this are hard to distinguish from AI junk. A comment that throws everything at the wall wastes time and derails discussions. Just focus on answering points raised: provide a source that explicitly supports your preferred text or drop the matter. Wikipedia has to rely on what reliable sources say and it is not acceptable to add text that relies on an editor understanding the big picture from reading a dozen books. If there is no explicit source for a contested statement, the statement has to go. A minute's thought will show that an encyclopedia that anyone can edit has to work like that. Johnuniq (talk) 05:13, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

Ban me please. Sources, research and EVEN GENETIC EVIDENCE was provided. The genetics clearly show that the modern AND ancient population are still connected to the Huns. I don't get the immense racism on Turkic people. What have the Huns done? Why is it hard to accept facts? But when someone of us starts debating other groups then it's automatically incorrect? This is being BEYOND two-faced... Sad to see. NO wonder KU Leuven, Leiden, Ugent refuses to use Wiki for research. AsianTiele (talk) 09:56, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

Again you have replied with a bunch of off-topic words. What is wanted is a brief reply in one place at one time to the question about sources. Please do not reply about that here. Instead, the reply should have been on the talk page of the article concerned. If you have already given a clear reply, and if you are asked for a reply again, the correct response would be to link to the first reply. Johnuniq (talk) 10:44, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

You're looking for racism where there is none. 208.87.236.180 (talk) 13:20, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

Related Articles