User talk:Balkywrest

My apologies for the block, I was wrong and realized that immediately.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:30, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

It's ok! Nobody's perfect. Balkywrest (talk) 12:32, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Hello Balkywrest. Your account has been granted the "rollbacker" and "pending changes reviewer" user rights. These user rights allow you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes and quickly revert the edits of other users.

Rollback user right

Please keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin).

Pending changes reviewer user right

The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection enabled is located at Special:StablePages. You may find the following pages useful to review:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes.
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of reviewer or rollback. If you no longer want either of these user rights, contact me and I'll remove it, alternatively you can leave a request on the administrators' noticeboard. Happy editing! GAB^gab 16:27, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Thank you! Balkywrest (talk) 16:33, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the blockchain and cryptocurrencies. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

MER-C 15:39, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi there. I noted you used rollback with this edit and wanted to remind you that rollback is only to be used for clear cases of vandalism. This was not one of those cases but a good faith attempt to change the date format to the one used on Germany, which is where the subject is from. Such reverts, if necessary, should always be accompanied with an explanation in the edit summary and consistent misuse of rollback to undo good faith edits will result in the right being revoked. You can use Twinkle to pseudo-rollback such edits with an explanation. Regards SoWhy 08:16, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

@SoWhy: Sorry about that! I was mass reverting edits made by Kipperfield socks. Balkywrest (talk) 12:03, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

No worries, just be careful with that button, it can easily be misused. Regards SoWhy 13:00, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Eulalia Pérez Sedeño.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Thanks for your contribution! It'd be great if you could go through and change some of your bulleted lists into paragraphs of prose. You'll see we generally don't leave folks' career descriptions as bulleted lists in their biographies. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ajpolino (talk) 18:01, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

L235 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 09:08, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi, a number of your WP:CSDcsd nominations for G11 have been inappropriate as they are not spam enough for G11 in draftspace. Please read WP:CSD, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 13:47, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

@Atlantic306: I don't see anything WP:CSD#G11 that says the spam threshold should be higher for drafts than in mainspace. Balkywrest (talk) 02:09, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

I wanted to create an article for a certain artist or rapper but am having troubles making it an actual article, it ends up being a talk page or a personal page or something... what am i doing and what aren't i doing ?? Plz help ! Sagher Genesis (talk) 11:20, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

I have moved it to draft space. Balkywrest (talk) 11:23, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

In an edit to Steemit you removed a notability tag with an edit summary remove tag added by sock. The edit who placed that tag was David Gerard who certainly is not a sock of anyone. Can you please explain and explain how this fits with assume good faith?  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   03:53, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

I'd love to hear that too - David Gerard (talk) 06:44, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

@David Gerard: Sorry about that. I removed the tag because it was added by blocked puppet R2d232h2 in this diff, not realizing that you had originally tagged here. I never assumed that you were a sockpuppet. Balkywrest (talk) 23:09, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

I have blocked this account as a sockpuppet of User:Septrillion (who in turn also was probably a sockpuppet of another user, but that's a story for another day). I'd rather not reveal what evidence led me to believe this here per WP:BEANS but am willing to share that info via email to anyone who asks. Sro23 (talk) 04:53, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Balkywrest. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eva Reich".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 07:06, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Alla Dorofeeva, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:10, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Balkywrest. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alla Dorofeeva".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 08:02, 20 November 2019 (UTC)