Hello, BaulinEF. We welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to sources you may be affiliated with.
If you wish to continue contributing, please first consider citing other reliable secondary sources such as review articles that were written by other researchers in your field and that are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite sources for which you may have a conflict of interest, please start a new section on the article's talk page and add {{Edit COI}} to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added.
Your submission at Articles for creation: International Institute of Molecular Mechanisms and Machines, Polish Academy of Sciences (April 18)
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, WeirdNAnnoyed, left the following feedback:
Clearly unreviewed LLM output. Violates WP:NEWLLM. Refs. 3, 4, and 6 are all 404's, suggesting hallucinations, and Ref. 8 does not support the claim it's cited for (it says "nearly 50% of IMol researchers," not "more than half"...and this is right out in the open where anyone paying attention will see it). The completely pointless two-bullet lists are also a dead giveaway. Rewrite properly, by a human, and check your references. I will reject if this article reappears at AfC without these changes made.
Hello, BaulinEF!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 12:22, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: International Institute of Molecular Mechanisms and Machines, Polish Academy of Sciences (August 7)
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Avgeekamfot, left the following feedback:
provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: International Institute of Molecular Mechanisms and Machines, Polish Academy of Sciences (August 12)
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Sulfurboy, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
This draft is not written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:
Your submission at Articles for creation: International Institute of Molecular Mechanisms and Machines, Polish Academy of Sciences (August 12)
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Brynn Who Likes Editing, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Sulfurboy declined your draft for this exact same reason. You did not heed their advice; instead, you immediately resubmitted it without any meaningful changes. Also, WeirdNAnnoyed told you to Rewrite properly four months ago because it contained clear LLM signs. I saw this draft's revision history: you did not do a rewrite, which means to write it again from the start. You only added and adjusted content. I still see the twice-used red links, which is a sign of LLM.
About Draft:International Institute of Molecular Mechanisms and Machines, Polish Academy of Sciences
I've heard you say that you did not use LLM, but you did translate it from Polish to English. It reads as though it came from a translator such as Google Translate or something similar, which are also considered LLM by Wikipedia. Your draft contains inconsistencies such as „ReMedy” instead of "ReMedy", ::.., … world.[15]. instead of … world.[15], a missing full stop, etc.
If you have used Google Translate or a similar technology, please disclose it. In fact, LLM translation is allowed so long as there is competent human oversight. You need to be able to correct any mistakes that a translator could make for use of one to be allowed. Thank you for listening. In solidarity, Brynn Who Likes Editing|talk w/ me! 12:07, 12 August 2026 (UTC)
Thank you! It seems you are the first user who actually read my explanatory comments.
Yes, I translated this page from the Polish version, I did it sentence by sentence using Google Translate and ChatGPT as starting points and edited the text on the fly. While I curated the meaning of the translated sentences, I apparently missed many typographic issues specific to formatting, as I edited the Wikipedia source directly. Regarding the red links - those pages existed in Polish version, but the English versions do not exist. I was not sure how to handle it, so I left it as red links. Now I removed the red links completely. I now also fixed the quotation marks and missing full stops as you mentioned.
In April the draft was declined for these issues and for 404-error references. The original references turned out to get outdated since the creation of the Polish version, so I fixed them, and polished the formatting as requested. Then, In August 7 the draft was declined due to no "reputable secondary published references" - I added at least six of those and extended the text further and resubmitted. 5 minutes after it was declined again, this time due to "non-neutral language". I interpreted it as an auto-detection of some keywords - and I thought it was due to having "prestigious" - which comes from the source actually. I removed this word and resubmitted.
Please let me know where/how do I have to disclose the usage of LLMs for translation and what can I do next to make the draft suitable for resubmission? Thank you! BaulinEF (talk) 14:40, 12 August 2026 (UTC)
You don't really have to disclose it anywhere else, I was just asking for you to disclose it here so discussion would be easier. You need to personally oversee any errors with the translation if there are any.
You've mentioned someone closing your draft due to it being "non-neutral language". Well, Wikipedia says that you shouldn't use a set of words known as peacock words, which includes "prestigious". It's good that you removed that word, and as of now the draft looks pretty neutral in tone, which is good.
If some sources return 404 errors, you can try using the Internet Archive to search for the sources and find a backup from before it started resulting in 404s. It seems as though you've already done that.
The draft also got declined due to it being non-notable. Sometimes, editors might treat foreign-language sources as less reliable or worse, which is a bad practice. But also, I don't know what the sources are, so could you explain the websites you used as sources and how significant they are? (i.e. are they very popular Polish journalism sites, national news, trusted reviews, or are they not very well known?) In solidarity, Brynn Who Likes Editing|talk w/ me! 15:44, 12 August 2026 (UTC)
1) References 6 and 9 from "Forum Akademickie" (https://forumakademickie.pl/) - popular Polish magazine covering higher education and science news. Reference 6 provides in-depth coverage of IMol, reference 9 is rather short - a note on IMol's relocation to a new building.
2) References 3, 17, 22 from Nauka w Polsce (Science in Poland, https://scienceinpoland.pl/en) - another Polish magazine, from it's website: "Science in Poland (scienceinpoland.pap.pl) is the largest public information service devoted to Polish science. Available in both Polish and English, around two million readers visit the website every year." - Unfortunately, all three references are available in Polish only (only some articles come in two languages on the portal).
4) Reference 12 from National Geographic Polska - I believe this one does not have to be explained, although the reference itself is more about the director of IMol, not IMol per se.
I hope this clarifies the thing. BaulinEF (talk) 17:44, 12 August 2026 (UTC)
That's good. Could you link me to the Polish version of the page? Then I can accept the draft and link the versions together and all that stuff. In solidarity, Brynn Who Likes Editing|talk w/ me! 19:33, 12 August 2026 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Feel free to further improve your accepted article.
Future articles
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Hello, BaulinEF. We welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to sources you may be affiliated with.
