User talk:Bellybutton.webnode.page

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Bellybutton.webnode.page

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Bellybutton.webnode.page, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. OutsideNormality (talk) 00:13, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (I do not think this article shoudl be deleted because I am not trying to advertise a company or anything. I have nothing to relate to this company. I know I cannot prove that I am not advertising but may you please trust me that I am not. ) --Bellybutton.webnode.page (talk) 00:17, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Degenhardt (December 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Rambley were:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Firstly, please properly cite your references; see Help:Referencing for beginners on how to do that. Secondly, please format this into paragraphs so it's not just one huge block of text. Finally, please work on the tone of the submission so it matches the formal and neutral tone we expect here.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James Degenhardt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rambley ^{(talk / contribs)} 00:24, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Bellybutton.webnode.page! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rambley ^{(talk / contribs)} 00:24, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

January 2026

Hello, I'm Belbury. An edit that you recently made to Horizontal proliferation seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Belbury (talk) 17:11, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello Belbury, I can assure you that I wrote the article by myself. Bellybutton.webnode.page (talk) 17:38, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Actually ... that's another problem. In 2026, everybody knows that Wikipedia does not publish original content. Bearian (talk) 11:19, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

You want to fight Bellybutton.webnode.page (talk) 15:00, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

February 2026

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dog. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. UtherSRG (talk) 18:00, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Sorry Bellybutton.webnode.page (talk) 16:15, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles