User talk:Bukboy35

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Bukharan Jews, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

• Copying text from other sources
• Policy on copyright
• Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
• Policy and guideline on non-free content

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

• Introduction
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 11:55, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Regarding your removal of content at Groups claiming affiliation with Israelites, your claim seems to be based on the fact that the content is not actually supported by the sources cited. That may be a valid claim. However, please make your case via discussion at the article's talk page and get consensus from other editors first. Leave the article at WP:STATUSQUO while discussion ensues and until new consensus is reached. ButlerBlog (talk) 14:16, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Bukboy35,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Bunnypranav, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged Menashe Harel for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bunnypranav}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 10:42, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

QuicoleJR (talk) 23:08, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

I deprodded this article, because (1) there are some sources on Google News, and (2) this is a controversial topic. Please go to WP:AfD. Bearian (talk) 03:31, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Good day to you.

I understand the picture you are trying to imply for Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice and Suicide Squad (2016 film); however, before trying to start an editing conflict, read MOS:FILMLEAD. Per the review consensus in the film's lead, we go by the review aggregate's general consensus on a film, which is usually from Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic: Batman v Superman has a score of 28% on RT (average rating of 5.0/10) and 44/100 on MC, while Suicide Squad has a score of 26% on RT (average rating of 4.8/10) and 40/100 on MC.

And for Batman v Superman: what do you mean "not lead appropriate"? It lists off why the film received mixed reviews, and there are also sources to back up why it received mixed reviews, particularly BBC News and The Hollywood Reporter. Not to mention, for why it received mixed reviews, there are four additional sources in a footnote regarding why it received the reception it did.

Unless you can't come to an appropriate consensus on either of the film's talk pages, then you honestly shouldn't be editing those pages in general. A consensus needs to be addressed before trying to start any sort of conflict. Multiplivision (talk) 14:10, 16 January 2026 (UTC)