User talk:Carfan87

Hello Carfan87 - I am not sure if merging the tables at Mercedes-Benz W124 is a good idea - sometimes, breaking this information up makes for easier to read tables. For the W124 there is simply a LOT of information and it can become overwhelming to present it all in one location. But I will wait for you to finish.  Mr.choppers | ✎  14:46, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback, I suppose that makes sense that one table summarises the production history whilst another goes technical into the engines. The only issue that I have is if information such as weight, top speed, acceleration & fuel economy come into play, the latter will have to be specific for every body type, as naturally the estates will be slower than the sedans.

I do agree that the W124 has the most complicated history of that manufacturer. Carfan87 (talk) 14:57, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

Here is an example of another layout which is quite readable. I recommend using your sandbox for time-consuming edits like these, by the way - it allows you to fiddle without leaving the article in an interim stage. Personally, I am old-fashioned; I like to sketch out what I want the table to look like on paper before I start messing with the code.  Mr.choppers | ✎  15:00, 10 July 2025 (UTC)

If you look at how the Italian version of the page writes it, I think it is very well formatted, but I'm going to clean up the second table as well, and shall see where it get's us.

Once again, on any other model, it would probably be possible to condense it to a manageable size, but ... but....124 is one voluminous story. That's ignoring all the pre-merger AMG models as well, like the Hammer, the Mallet, the 3.4, etc. Carfan87 (talk) 08:21, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Carfan87,
Have a prosperous, productive and wonderful New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

(Zakk😎) 17:32, 6 January 2026 (UTC)