User talk:Carvlin7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Carvlin7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Lauri Stallings, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

Welcome!

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! MikeWazowski (talk) 20:51, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lauri Stallings

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lauri Stallings requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MikeWazowski (talk) 20:51, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lauri Stallings

The article Lauri Stallings has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. KuyaBriBriTalk 21:42, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

This article has been drafted to meet Wikipedia’s notability and sourcing guidelines for biographies of living persons. It is my first article, and I’m doing a good bit of research to get this right. I have included additional references from articles in the New YorkTimes, The Denver Post, Burnaway, BOMB Magazine, ArtsATL, and Pittsburgh City Paper. I’ve included both critical reviews and feature-length interviews that show significant coverage of Lauri Stallings’ choreographic work and her role as founder of gloATL. I Have taken care to maintain a neutral point of view and avoid promotional language. If any concerns arise regarding sourcing, weight, or tone, I welcome suggestions for improvement and am happy to revise accordingly.

Speedy deletion nomination of Lauri Stallings

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lauri Stallings, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. KuyaBriBriTalk 21:42, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Your note on Lauri Stallings

Unfortunately, the page you wrote was promotional, and in essence appeared to be a CV. Before creating any more articles, please review our policy on a neutral writing style. Also please note that all material, especially in the biography of a living person, must be attributed to a reliable source. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:09, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox/Lauri Stallings (February 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by ChrysGalley were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The requirement for living people is for inline citations, see WP:BLP. Once done this will allow a proper consideration of notability under WP:CREATIVE but a long list of bare URL references is not the best way to do this. See WP:REFB for how to reference correctly.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
ChrysGalley (talk) 23:22, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Carvlin7! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ChrysGalley (talk) 23:22, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lauri Stallings, American Choreographer (April 3)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, ChrysGalley, left the following feedback:
This draft appears to be generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You should not use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with the below issues may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

  • hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
  • unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
  • copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.
We can't accept submissions from LLM, see WP:NEWLLM.

Next steps

Need help?

Scam warning

ChrysGalley (talk) 14:57, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lauri Stallings, American Choreographer (April 7)

Draft rejected
Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted.

Reason for rejection
The reviewer, Pythoncoder, left the following feedback:
Still reads as LLM output

Next steps

Scam warning

pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 21:32, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hello Carvlin7! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Draft article - first time user, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:03, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI