User talk:CentenarianKid

December 2025

Hello, I'm Nvdtn19. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Doug the Pug—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Nvdtn19 (talk) 14:45, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

Very sorry for wasting your time, I just thought it would be helpful cause he really is 13.

Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as the one you made with this edit to List of Japanese supercentenarians, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ‎ ‎ B⠄Jayden ^(talk) 14:49, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm B.Jayden, and welcome to Wikipedia. I appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. ‎ ‎ B⠄Jayden ^(talk) 14:50, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, B.Jayden. I'm CentenarianKid. Yes I understand you're technically right, but I don't think it would cause any harm. Shigeko Kagawa is a supercentenarian who needs a biography, I can't begin to understand why no one has added one yet. In the future I will add sources, such as that for "Longeviquest" Also if you ever want to chat about supercentenarians on my talk page please let me know, I have a lot to talk about! CentenarianKid (talk) 14:53, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yolanda Beltrao de Azevedo (December 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yolanda Beltrao de Azevedo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 01:14, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, CentenarianKid! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 01:14, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

Who's your favorite supercentenarian?

I know this maybe isn't good for Wikipedia but i'd just like to know who's you're favorite supercentenarian? Please don't get mad at me for making this I just thought it would be fun. I'll start. Ethel Caterham, Joao Marinho Neto, and Kane Tanaka are all my favorites, but if I had to pick one, it would be Joao Marinho Neto i like that he's involved with fans and that was so nice what he did for Caterham's 116th bithday. CentenarianKid (talk) 01:19, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

So I'm Centenariankid again if you're a supercentenarian fan I'd really like to get a reply if you're not well I'd still like a reply CentenarianKid (talk) 14:37, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

I encourage everyone here to talk about this with me, I am currently trying to make an account on 110 club I really love supercentenarians. I will be posting things on my talk page related to supercentenarians. For now, I just want to say RIP Mamie Tei. I thought she would live to 113 but I guess I was wrong. Don't be afraid to post stuff here Okay? CentenarianKid (talk) 23:07, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

My favorite SC is also Joao Marinho Neto. I am still CentenarianKid please reply. If you are interested in discussing supercentenarians we can chat on my talk page or yours, either way is fine. ~2025-41557-92 (talk) 23:15, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

WELCOME TO THE OFFICIAL SUPERCENTENARIAN TALK!

Hello, my supercentenarian-loving friends! I'm CentenarianKid, a supercentenarian fan from The United States. Anyone who's interested in talking about supercentenarians may come here. To start this off: who is your favorite supercentenarian? I personally love 113-year old Joao Marinho Neto, for many reasons. Also I'd like to say RIP Sumiko Mori. I thought for sure she'd reach 114. Any other thoughts? Any other favorites? Waiting for replies! CentenarianKid (talk) 14:56, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Related Articles