User talk:Chico Loco 40

This is Chico Loco 40's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chico Loco 40 (March 13)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Quinntropy, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for music. The draft requires either:

evidence that the subject meets any of the specific criteria for music;

or multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

It is often easier to prove the notability of an album or artist than an individual song or band member. If the subject is not yet notable, consider improving a relevant existing article instead.

Next steps

Edit Draft:Chico Loco 40 to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

• Quinn (talk) 16:31, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Chico Loco 40! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! • Quinn (talk) 16:31, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

March 2026

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. • Quinn (talk) 16:31, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Question about my draft: Chico Loco 40

Hello Quinn,

Thank you for reviewing my draft. I understand that my article needs stronger independent sources.

I currently have one article published by La Caverna and I am working on getting additional media coverage about my music.

Could you please advise what type of sources would be acceptable so I can improve the draft before resubmitting?

Thank you for your guidance. Chico Loco 40 (talk) 20:08, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

See WP:RS, which describes what we consider to be reliable. The general "golden rule" is three sources at minimum that are independent, reliable, and in-depth. Please be aware that promotional material often fails to be fully independent and reliable. Think of newspapers, TV outlets, reliable magazines, etc. • Quinn (talk) 23:31, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles