User talk:CoffeeCrumbs

The second AFD for Belle Knox has been overturned and relisted. As you commented on the original AFD, you may wish to comment on this one as well. As there have been developments and sources created since the time of the original AFD, please review to see if your comments/!vote are the same or may have changed. Gaijin42 (talk)

Hi CoffeeCrumbs, and my apologies for having to remove three of your G5 speedy deletion tags from pages that were initially created by the Eastmain and Eastmain2 accounts while also reverting Eastmain's continued block-evading edits. I did so because what I noticed before removing these tags was that the drafts in question were first created before the owner of these two accounts and Eastmain3 was blocked from editing in February 2026 and subsequently created many more socks. Based on my understanding of WP:G5, it states that the criteria applies to pages that were created by banned or blocked users in violation of their ban or block, as well as pages created in violation of general sanctions, and hence, only pages that were created by a person while evading blocks/bans or not obeying general sanctions at the time of the page's creation may be tagged and deleted per G5. So far, I do not see any evidence of Eastmain evading blocks, bans or general sanctions before February 2026. If I really made a mistake in removing these G5 tags, please let me know. Thanks. ~SG5536B 02:14, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

It's not a mistake, it was a bit of a stretch on my part; I was going on that the theory that almost all of the edits of the articles were created by the editor's sockpuppets. I can probably just PROD but I was trying to save a little time in an obviously awkward situation. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 02:23, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the help with this user. I was just checking their other commits in case they made any other revisions not spotted, and found this where they (once again) are posting a personal website that has nothing to do with my Wikipedia activity. They've posted this before and the revision has been "deleted" so that it's removed from the history. Do you know how to initiate this so this latest one can be removed also?

Is there anything we can do apart from block each new temporary account as they appear? Phil 07:23, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Hi please can you help to explain why this page keeps being reverted to an inaccurate version? ~2026-42593-92 (talk) 16:47, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

You need to stop evading your block. Until you're an editor in good standing, you have no say in any content on English Wikipedia. If and when you are unblocked, you can start a discussion on the talk page and seek to build consensus that you and your housemate's preferred version is the better one. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 17:00, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Your extremely childish edit on an administrator's page is not going to make getting unblocked easier. This is a collaborative project for people building an encyclopedia, while acting like mature adults. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 17:02, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gun control 2. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gun control 2/Evidence; private evidence may be sent to arbcom-en-bwikimedia.org. Additional parties may be proposed during the first week of the evidence phase. Please add your evidence by August 15, 2026 at 23:59 UTC, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gun control 2/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Party guide/Introduction. For the Arbitration Committee, GoldRomean (talk) 18:11, 1 August 2026 (UTC)