User talk:CosmLearner
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is CosmLearner's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 1 hour  |
Blocked for sockpuppetry
 | This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived until 20:18, 5 April 2029 (UTC). |
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
CosmLearner (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
I and TheNeutrality have been suspected of being sockpuppets. In the 2024 Bangladesh anti-Hindu violence article, TheNeutrality has almost always supported my edits. Similarly, in the 2024 Chittagong unrest article, when another editor reverted my edits, TheNeutrality reverted that editor's changes and rewrote the section in a manner quite similar to mine. This does not mean that TheNeutrality is my, CosmLearner's, sockpuppet. At the article 2024 Bangladesh anti-Hindu violence edits of a similar nature were made by editors like Za-ari-masen, AAShemul, Ahammed Saad and Bruno pnm ars and at article 2024 Chittagong unrest the editors Ahammed Saad and LucrativeOffer also manifested in similar ways. This does not necessarily mean that they are sockpuppets of one another. Both articles deal with topics of interest to users in Bangladesh and parts of India. The TheNeutrality account was created; it made an enormous number of edits only on the 2024 Bangladesh anti-Hindu violence article initially, and then also on the article, 2024 Chittagong unrest. If you examine TheNeutrality's contribution page, it becomes clear that they supported my edits. But how does this prove sockpuppetry. Perhaps TheNeutrality liked the topics of these two articles and found my edits useful, which is why they supported my contributions to these articles. Since TheNeutrality is not a real name, I cannot recognize them. Some of my friends that live in the neighboring flats may edit Wikipedia. Each one is connected through their independent internet service providers. My residence has an internet connection only to the devices that I use. I adhere to Wikipedia guidelines and am fully aware of the rules about sockpuppetry. I categorically deny the suspicion of being a sockpuppet operator. I request that my account be unblocked and that the changes made to my user page and other areas be reverted to their original state. If you are certain that I am involved in sockpuppetry, I will not make any further requests for unblocking. C⚛smLearner 💬🔬 07:31, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
There are some occurrences here that are incredibly unlikely to coincidental. This combined with the evidence displayed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CosmLearner makes it improbable to me that you are two different users. I've also blocked a new sock, Mysterious Particle (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI). DatGuyTalkContribs 11:57, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.