User talk:DaBoss4344
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hi DaBoss4344! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Your submission at Articles for creation: Abiotrophia defectiva has been accepted

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
- See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.
Future articles
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Next steps
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
- Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
ChrysGalley (talk) 10:46, 21 April 2026 (UTC)- @DaBoss4344 - thanks for the above article. I ummed and erred about adding in this category:Streptococcal infections - in view of the morphology history, I think it ought to go in that really, to help find the article, but the "strictly speaking" stuff got too hard for me to think about..... Please check the other categories in case I have missed one or two. ChrysGalley (talk) 10:50, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
- Having a look at what pages are currently in that category it doesn't really match up I dont think. As most of those pages are about the infections themselves not the bacteria causing them. Im not too sure what other categories it could fit under. DaBoss4344 (talk) 11:00, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
- Forgot to add thank you for reviewing! Appreciate it. DaBoss4344 (talk) 11:00, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
- No problem @DaBoss4344, let's leave it then. I am actually a bit concerned how undeveloped the categories are for this area, compared to obscure football leagues, but that's life I guess. Thanks again. ChrysGalley (talk) 11:03, 21 April 2026 (UTC)