User talk:Dagelf
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Speak your mind! Be direct! Be critical! Be constructive!
A cup of tea for you!
Here's a cup of tea for you to pass around. Sorry, fresh out of milk, so it'll have to be rooibos tea.
 |
Just being nice to everyone! |
The tea is so you can deal with things like... people reverting your NPOV edits and then telling you you're "edit warring" if you dare offend their bias...
- Could I perhaps share some quotes from this page with you...
- "Achieving what the Wikipedia community understands as neutrality means carefully and critically analyzing a variety of reliable sources and then attempting to convey to the reader the information contained in them fairly"
- "Wikipedia aims to describe disputes, but not engage in them. The aim is to inform, not influence. Editors, while naturally having their own points of view, should strive in good faith to provide complete information and not to promote one particular point of view over another."
- "Avoid stating opinions as facts."
- "If different reliable sources make conflicting assertions about a matter, treat these assertions as opinions rather than facts, and do not present them as direct statements."
- "try to rewrite the passage or section to achieve a more neutral tone."
- "Remove material when you have a good reason to believe it misinforms or misleads readers in ways that cannot be addressed by rewriting the passage."
- In light of that, if you see "left-wing" or "right-wing" removed, please ask yourself if reverting it will escalate or de-escalate bias on Wikipedia, and whether your action is in line with our stated policies and the community we want.
- Note that WP:N does not mean we have to give equal weight to every side. Nor do we strive to "offend equally".
Bigotry on Wikipedia
The only real problem with Wikipedia is people with more time than sense, perhaps..? Still, I'd rather have it, than have nothing.
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Dagelf. Thank you for your work on Tyson Yunkaporta. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thanks for creating this biography; Yunkaporta doesn't meeting WP:NACADEMIC, but might reach WP:NAUTHOR. It might be best merge Sand Talk to here (or the reverse) as currently most reliable sourcing comes from his first book.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 18 November 2025 (UTC)