Sir,
My work is an original done through painstaking reasearch of the subject for max authencity and full fledged and not a copycat work. Please note, hence, your merger proposal is not acceptable.
Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sj2021c (talk • contribs) 14:02, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Comment
January 2021
New pages patrol January–February 2026 Backlog drive
New Pages Patrol is hosting a one-time, two-month experimental backlog drive aimed at reducing the backlog. This will be a combo drive: both articles and redirects will earn points.
The drive will run from 1 January to 28 February 2026.
The drive is divided into two phases. Participants may take part in either phase or across both phases, depending on availability.
Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled during the drive.
Two-month drive-exclusive barnstars will be awarded to eligible participants.
Each article review earns 1 point, while each redirect review earns 0.2 points.
Streak awards will be granted based on consistently meeting weekly point thresholds.
Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
Klbrain, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 16:23, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
@Klbrain: Thank you for the notification. I have objected to the PROD on the article's talk page and I am currently working on improving the article with independent secondary sources. Ruttinhapoter (talk) 15:07, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
David Altshuler (physician)
Hi Klbrain. I hope all is well. I noticed that you contribute to the WikiProject Pharmacology, so I am hoping you might be interested in an edit request for David Altshuler (physician), the chief science officer at the pharmaceutical company Vertex. The edit request is found here: Talk:David Altshuler (physician)#Awards and Personal life. Please note that the first half of the request, which was to correct a few mistakes, has already been implemented. Only the second half is still open, and that is simple and straightforward. I would appreciate it if you could implement what's left. Thanks so much, JohnDatVertex (talk) 13:22, 15 January 2026 (UTC)
Sure; DoneKlbrain (talk) 00:22, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
Thanks so much for your quick response and implementation of the ER. All the best, JohnDatVertex (talk) 14:24, 21 January 2026 (UTC)
For over 1,000 article reviews during 2025. Well done! Keep up the good work! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:58, 21 January 2026 (UTC)
Merge discussions
Given your prolific merge activity, you may have something to contribute to this discussion ~Kvng (talk) 22:27, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
Thanks for the ping; I've put in my penny's-worth. It's interesting to see how many people comment on such proposals compare to how many actually are actively involved in merging, but that's human nature! I'm currently involved with the NPP backlog drive, but will be back to the merge backlog soon! Klbrain (talk) 19:51, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
Thanks, I hope you wrote that without reading my !vote first. I agree that there doesn't seem to be a significant problem here in practice. I hope the opinions of editors that uses these processes frequently are somehow given more weight than opinions of those who just like to give opinions. ~Kvng (talk) 21:44, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
I did write it independently, and had not read your comments - I sampled a few to get a sense of the fors and against, and the tone of the discussion, but wasn't looking at user names. I did spot a few who have been annoyed with particular merges, and are concerned about how slow implementation can be - it is certainly faster and easier to delete something that it is to merge them. Klbrain (talk) 13:23, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
A multi-year effort clearing merge proposal backlog ~Kvng (talk) 22:29, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
Sorry for the extra notification. It appears were the editor who completed the initial merger and redirect in 2015 and were not the editor who later removed the relevant content. I got my notices mixed up. No need to respond—just correcting the record—but feel free to participate in the discussion. —Myceteae🍄🟫 (talk) 20:42, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
January–February 2026 NPP drive - Phase 2
NPP unreviewed article statistics as of February 02, 2026
Welcome to Phase 2 of the January–February 2026 NPP drive. During Phase 1, we reviewed 16,658 articles and 4,416 redirects, and there is currently a backlog of 16,475 articles and 23,782 redirects in the queue. Fantastic job! Completing 22,502 patrols in the first phase made a significant dent in the backlog. Let's keep our foot on the gas for Phase 2, and I hope we can achieve even more reviews than Phase 1. Best of luck!
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Schild equation, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
As described at Talk:Organoantimony chemistry, I propose to split out the large homework section on Lewis acids. This topic has been discussed previously, leading to a merge, which I am respectfully suggesting should be largely undone.--Smokefoot (talk) 15:31, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
Very happy for that discussion to be had, of course, and to accept the outcome. Klbrain (talk) 18:19, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
The article Hide photography has been proposed for deletionbecause of the following concern:
Tagged as Unreferenced for 13 years. No other language has a reliably sourced article from which to translate. Unsourced personal essay.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Bearian (talk) 19:12, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
Bold Redirects? Slow down!
Hi,
I have reverted couple of your bold redirects because I do find them objectionable. I will suggest you to slow down as your bold redirects are getting challenged by others. You should not be doing this repeatedly. Sumiono (talk) 21:13, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
Also I will suggest you to revisit WP:Merge as it seems there are certain criterias mentioned there which are necessary to be fulfilled for an official merge. Sumiono (talk) 21:16, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
They are sometimes reversed, and I have no problem with that. Please see Wikipedia:New pages patrol#Merging for the protocol under which I'm operating. I'm also surprised that a newlt created account demonstrates such elegant use of protocol. Could you let me know what other accounts you have or have operataed under? Klbrain (talk) 21:40, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
@Klbrain Actually I am not obliged to disclose my alternate account to you or anyone unless I am running for adminship. Sometimes becoming too bold looks disruptive to your fellow new page patrollers, I see you got NPR in 2024. And FYI, I am a new page patroller much more before than 2024 to my alt, and also been a mentor to newbie NPPers, so pretty much familiar with the nuances of Wikipedia. If you still have concerns see legitimate use of alternate accounts. Sumiono (talk) 21:53, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
Nice to know; I sent you a welcome message (before I read your reply here); happy editing. Klbrain (talk) 21:56, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
@Klbrain Do you really think that Hume Society lacks notability? Weird enough? The article didn't cited secondary sources it does not mean that it fails notability. I will suggest you to atleast try to find better sources from Google scholars, Google books, etc, I am very worried about your behaviour, you are recklessly redirecting articles which were even there in the main space since 90 days. Have you ever consider joining NPP SCHOOL? Sumiono (talk) 22:03, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
