User talk:Deadriafp

Hello, Deadriafp, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Deadria Farmer-Paellmann, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! BombCraft8 ^{(talk) (contributions)} 11:37, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. I think I'm following guidelines. The subject has been the subject of numerous articles besides those cited. A few others include: 1. https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Business/story?id=89884&page=1#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=17569009743949&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com

2. https://www.democracynow.org/2000/3/14/aetna_acknowledges_issuing_slave_policies_during

3. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/slavery-reparations-sought/

4. https://culturalpropertynews.org/benin-bronzes-lawsuit-against-smithsonian-deadria-farmer-paellmann-bruce-afran-interview/

And she is discussed in two Wikipedia articles, each with 3 approved references:

1.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reparations_for_slavery_in_the_United_States

2. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mae_Louise_Miller

Please let me know of more is needed. Thank you. Deadriafp (talk) 12:26, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi there! Are you Deadria Farmer-Paellmann? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:09, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Draft:Deadria Farmer-Paellmann requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it exhibits one or more of the following signs which indicate that the page could only plausibly have been generated by large language models (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) and would have been removed by any reasonable human review:

• Communication intended for the user: This may include collaborative communication (e.g., "Here is your Wikipedia article on..."), knowledge-cutoff disclaimers (e.g., "Up to my last training update ..."), self-insertion (e.g., "as a large language model"), and phrasal templates (e.g., "Smith was born on [Birth Date].")
• Implausible non-existent references: This may include external links that are dead on arrival, ISBNs with invalid checksums, and unresolvable DOIs. Since humans can make typos and links may suffer from link rot, a single example should not be considered definitive. Editors should use additional methods to verify whether a reference truly does not exist.
• Nonsensical citations: This may include citations of incorrect temporality (e.g a source from 2020 being cited for a 2022 event), DOIs that resolve to completely unrelated content (e.g., a paper on a beetle species being cited for a computer science article), and citations that attribute the wrong author or publication.

Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Pages created using them that did not undergo human review may be deleted at any time.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find creating new encyclopedia content yourself difficult, please share this with other editors at the Teahouse, and they may be able to help. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your legitimate contributions. BombCraft8 ^{(talk) (contributions)} 11:37, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions! You may have used a large language model (LLM), such as ChatGPT, in your edits. While using LLMs can be very useful, machine-generated text—much like human-created text—can contain errors or flaws, or be outright useless (see WP:LLM). Specifically, asking an LLM to "write a Wikipedia article" can sometimes cause the output to be outright fabrication, complete with fictitious references. It may be biased, may libel living people, or violate copyrights. Thus, editors should verify all LLM-generated text before using it in an article. Please prioritize manual contributions and thorough research when editing. If you are unsure about your wording, an alternative is to suggest it on the talk page for another volunteer to look at it. If you are creating a new article, you may find it help to use Articles for Creation process, where you can receive feedback on your work. Thank you! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:07, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. The article is accurate and truthful. That is why I have been covered by the press the last 25 years. They trust me. These are controversial issues. The problem with the article was the links expired. I had them in my research for a few years. Most of them were fine.

I appreciate your suggestions. I have reviewed every detail closely, checked all links and removed the ones that I could not get to function. The article looks solid at this point. Deadriafp (talk) 17:06, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Deadriafp, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Rsgincorp1 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:11, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

In addition, please respond to the question I asked above regarding whether you are Deadria Farmer-Paellmann. If you are Deadria Farmer-Paellmann, you will want to review Wikipedia's content guidelines regarding autobiographies. If you are not Deadria Farmer-Paellmann, you will need to request a change to your username. It is against Wikipedia's username policy to impersonate another person. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:13, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

Do I have another account? When was it last used? Rsgincorp1 is my nonprofit organization Restitution Study Group, but it should not be in use. If it is, perhaps someone else is using it. We are fiscal sponsors for another organization that might have access, but it is unlikely. How can I find out if it has been used? In any case, deadriafp is my personal account. Deadriafp (talk) 16:04, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

OK, I see that the other account has not been active since 2023. I must have missed something when I came across it. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:08, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

Yes. Different email too. I did prepare this latest version. I am Deadria Farmer-Paellmann. Has it been deleted? Deadriafp (talk) 11:26, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

Greetings. I'm following up on the Wikipedia post for Deadria Farmer-Paellmann. There are several Wikipedia post that reference Deadria Farmer-Paellmann yet no post specifically for her. This effort is an attempt to remedy that oversight. What is the status? Is she blacklisted from having a dedicated post? It seems to be the case. Deadriafp (talk) 13:45, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Deadria Farmer-Paellmann is not a blacklisted article. However, you are discouraged from creating it. If you think you meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for people, you may request that the article be created. One place to do so would be the Women in Red WikiProject, which creates articles for women. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:10, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Dear Significa liberate. Can you help me create the article in Woman in Red? I am certain I meet the notability guidelines. I have been an critical voice in a movement fir decades and am mentioned in several Wikipedia posts, but do not have one focusing on the full breadth of my work.

Wikipedia is an important information source. I want students doing research to have a good place to start. I have been the catalyst for landmark human rights efforts. My post directs researchers to key information about who I am and what I have done.

Thank you for any help you can provide. Deadriafp (talk) 04:30, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

As I have stated previously, you are discouraged from creating this article. If you think you meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for people, you may request that the article be created. One place to do so would be the Women in Red WikiProject, which creates articles for women. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:46, 14 March 2026 (UTC)