User talk:Diisiaczek

I’ve undone your edit. As a paid advocate, you should not edit conflicted articles directly, but rather suggest amendments on the article Talkpage. And your client’s website is NOT a reliable, independent source. KJP1 (talk) 17:28, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your explanation. The reference to Goshka's work being mentioned in the BBC is a video recorded by her years ago to document this event. It cannot be found elsewhere, but in their private archives, hence stored on her private website. How would you suggest turning it into a reliable source? Diisiaczek (talk) 17:49, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

I wouldn’t suggest anything. As my personal view is that paid editing, such as yours, is wholly inimical to the interests of Wikipedia, I don’t advise paid editors. KJP1 (talk) 19:45, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your response. I would like to clarify that my earlier use of the word “client” was imprecise and does not reflect a paid relationship. English is not my first language, and I used the term loosely to refer to someone I have collaborated with in the past in a cultural context. I am not receiving any payment, commission, or other compensation for editing this article.

This is my first experience contributing to Wikipedia, and I am doing so in my own time as part of my broader volunteer involvement in promoting Polish cultural initiatives in the UK. I understand that previous wording may have created the impression of a conflict of interest, and I appreciate the importance of transparency and adherence to Wikipedia’s policies.

Regarding sources: I now understand that material hosted on the subject’s own website, even if it documents an event such as a BBC recording, does not meet the requirements for independent reliable sourcing. I will therefore refrain from using it as a reference and will instead look for coverage in independent, reliable publications. If such sources cannot be found, I accept that the information should not be included.

To avoid any COI concerns, I will use the Talk page to propose changes rather than editing the article directly. I am still learning Wikipedia’s guidelines on notability, reliable sources, and neutral point of view, and I welcome any policy-based guidance from experienced editors.

Thank you for your time. Diisiaczek (talk) 20:33, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

My pleasure. KJP1 (talk) 22:04, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Goshka (Malgorzata) Bialek. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:29, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the review and for moving the article to Draft space.

I will work on improving it by adding independent, reliable sources, removing any self-published material, and ensuring a neutral, encyclopaedic tone that meets notability requirements.

For transparency, I have previously collaborated with Goshka Białek in a cultural context, but I am not being paid or compensated for creating and editing this or any other articles. I will follow Wikipedia’s COI guidance while working on the draft.

I will resubmit once these issues have been addressed. Diisiaczek (talk) 20:37, 18 February 2026 (UTC)