User talk:DizzyBlams

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: KelziBoop (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by ChrysGalley were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
So as a minimum we need to meet the WP:GOLDENRULE - and sourcing via Pinterest and Instagram won't qualify. Without this there is no notability, and without that there is no article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
ChrysGalley (talk) 22:21, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, DizzyBlams! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ChrysGalley (talk) 22:21, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Toyville (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ScalarFactor was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of web content). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
ScalarFactor (talk) 22:59, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alley Trash: Blizzard (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Quinntropy was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
 Quinn (talk) 13:31, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Alley Trash: Blizzard moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Alley Trash: Blizzard. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 15:32, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of KelziBoop for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KelziBoop is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KelziBoop until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 15:35, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Toyville for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Toyville is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toyville until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 15:37, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Reborn as a Swordsman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reborn as a Swordsman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reborn as a Swordsman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jahaza (talk) 17:04, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cat Scratch

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cat Scratch requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jahaza (talk) 17:04, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Jahaza (talk) 17:07, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Notability issues

Hi! I wanted to give a bit of an explanation as to why the articles are getting deleted.

First off, I want to say that it's great that you and your friends are being creative and putting out work. Everyone has to take that first step and I hope that everything goes well! I highly recommend, if you haven't already, reaching out to some author groups either online or in your local area. It's good to get a wide variety of people to read and critique your work, as each one will bring in their own unique perspectives. Even if they're not the target audience, sometimes those readers can be super helpful! You may want to check your local library, as they often have information on this type of thing and may even have their own classes. Otherwise, stuff like this can be very helpful. It's geared towards younger writers and as such kind of simplistic, but the info is useful for all ages. This also looks to be helpful.

As for notability, the long and short is that it's all about coverage. In order to establish notability you will need to show where the topic (be it person, book, show, company, etc) has been covered in independent, secondary reliable sources (hereafter referred to as RS for sake of typing). This is something that can be kind of difficult to establish, as most topics aren't covered in places that Wikipedia would see as RS. Stuff put out by the author or by people/organizations affiliated with them would be seen as a WP:PRIMARY source and can't give notability, as it's something they made themselves. To be honest, most stuff isn't going to get this coverage as the places Wikipedia would see as RS can only cover so many topics.

Please be aware that the nominations aren't personal and the deletions aren't a statement on the quality of the works in question. As mentioned above, notability can be incredibly difficult to establish. Case in point: Matt Dinniman is the author of the Dungeon Crawler Carl books. The series is very well known, however Dinniman himself was not seen as independently notable outside of the series until very recently. As such, per Wikipedia guidelines he didn't merit his own article despite Dinniman and his series being fairly beloved by his fanbase. It's just that difficult.

I hope that this all helps! ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 21:16, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Reborn as a Swordsman

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Reborn as a Swordsman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MidnightMayhem (talk) 22:04, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Alley Trash: Blizzard

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Alley Trash: Blizzard, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 05:25, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Toyville

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Toyville, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 05:26, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Information icon Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

Deb (talk) 09:11, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI