User talk:DotXK

Thanks for uploading File:808s & Heartbreak - KAWS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello dot! I seen that you reverted two of my edits on Bully (album). I can understand why you reverted the one with the logo but the alternative cover CAN be proven to be bully V1 as seen here and here. Wobs100 (talk) 00:59, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Those are misreports, as WW3 (CUCK) wasn't announced yet. Kanye was working on both albums at that time, and it's unlikely that the swastika cover was intended for BULLY since it wasn't at all political and CUCK is. Kanye simply announced the cover with the vague caption "NEW ALBUM COVER", he still hasn't specified if the cover was for CUCK though ᴅᴏᴛXK (BRIXK) (T/C) 01:25, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

oh Wobs100 (talk) 01:34, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

On the Kanye article it lists that the Album cover is for bully though what should be done about that? Wobs100 (talk) 01:39, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

and the other bully articles in other languages for that matter? Wobs100 (talk) 01:42, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

I just removed the claim on the Kanye article

I'll probably do the same for the other BULLY articles (it was only there because they were translated when the English one had that before it got removed) ᴅᴏᴛXK (BRIXK) (T/C) 01:45, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

I want to recommend you to nominate "Awesome (song)" for GA if you want to. It's pretty impressive when it comes to unreleased music. Seeing its good structure and sourcing, I could review it for you. If you don't want to, maybe notify Wackistan. - RTSthestardust (talk) 06:47, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Awesome (song) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RTSthestardust -- RTSthestardust (talk) 04:02, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Awesome (song) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RTSthestardust -- RTSthestardust (talk) 05:21, 5 August 2026 (UTC)