User talk:Durranistan

Please stop your edit warring and pushing Iranian regimes propaganda into the infobox of this article. No editor, besides yourself wants to include the Iranian regime's claims about the alleged number of IRGC goons killed. You've been reverted by numerous others yet you keep pushing this content. Ecrusized (talk) 17:29, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

10 of the casualties are reported from the opposition

"Anti-regime media reported on January 9 that clashes between protesters and security forces in Kermanshah Province killed at least 10 IRGC Ground Forces Nabi Akram Unit members.[14] The Nabi Akram Unit is headquartered in Kermanshah City and is subordinate to the Najaf-e Ashraf Operational Base, which oversees IRGC Ground Forces units in Kermanshah, Hamedan, and Ilam provinces.[15] The deaths of IRGC soldiers are notable because these individuals are from a military force, not the police, and should be more capable in violent situations. Social media users have also reported that the regime has deployed the IRGC in Ilam Province, although the regime has not confirmed this deployment at the time of this writing.[16]"^[1]

So if you truly care about the page being "propaganda-free" there would still be government casualties. You're the only editor that wants to remove the facts and your obvious bias is showing Durranistan (talk) 17:39, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

The killed IRGC do not belong in this article. They are not being killed by protestors, but Kurdish or Baloch militant/separatists groups. This article is about the protests. Its not about Iran–PJAK conflict, or Sistan and Baluchestan insurgency. By adding those deaths to the infobox, you're playing into the regime's narrative that protestors are violent, even though they are completely unrelated conflicts. Ecrusized (talk) 17:48, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Balochi militant groups are a belligerent of the protests, as seen in the infobox, so any casualties that are conflicted by them should be added. But I don't see how that would make the protests less violent, there are instances of protesters commiting arson and burning down mosques and reported by reliable sources^[2] Durranistan (talk) 17:57, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Those were burned by the regime to put the blame on protestors probably. The regime is blood-thirsty, and killed over 200 protestors over the past two days in Tehran alone. Just like it has done in 2019 and 2022. But Khamenei's days are coming to an end. Ecrusized (talk) 18:03, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

whatever the case may be, what we should prioritize is truth via reliable sources, the sources I use (ISW and Agence France Presse) is relatable by Wikipedias standards and ISW is anti-regime by how they portray it as, but they still reported it by using both pro and anti regime media as well as a Norwegian human rights organization that reported the deaths of 2 IRGC members. So it's better to show what's factual than cleaning the image of a faction, whether you support it or not Durranistan (talk) 18:25, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

You have recently made edits related to post-1978 Iranian politics. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1978 Iranian politics is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:57, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi. I saw you did a mass edit across many (all?) Burkina Faso party articles. Note that not all parties cease to exist when declared unlawful by a government, and in several cases it might very well be that parties of the 1990s and early 2000s had already ceased to function. Rather than placing dissolved January 2026 in infobox and categories, a better option is to place the Template:Update on the articles. -- Soman (talk) 09:18, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

i think it's better to remove if a reliable source said that a party goes against the mass dissolving by the government. Until then it should be marked as dissolved atleast de jure, including parties that ceased to function before but didn't announced that it has been dissolved Durranistan (talk) 09:24, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Unmanned Systems Forces (Russia), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:02, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Pokrovsk offensive. The source mentioned no Russian capture of Svitle, this is the final time I give you a warning rather than report you to WP:A/E. TylerBurden (talk) 14:56, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Are you blind or what? https://understandingwar.org/map/assessed-control-of-terrain-in-the-pokrovsk-agglomeration-february-4-2026-at-130-pm-et/ is in the same source that talks about the capture of Myrnohrad which mentioned Svitle Durranistan (talk) 15:02, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

"Are you blind or what?"

So your response to being called out for adding synth is is to violate WP:CIVIL. The source makes the following single mention of Svitle in the actual text: "Russian forces attacked near and within Pokrovsk itself; northwest of Pokrovsk near Hryshyne; north of Pokrovsk near Rodynske and toward Bilytske; east of Pokrovsk near Myrnohrad and Svitle; and southwest of Pokrovsk near Kotlyne, Udachne, and Molodetske on February 3 and 4.[70] A Russian milblogger claimed that Ukrainian forces counterattacked near Rodynske.[71]"

If you want to add Svitle, you should find a reliable source which confirms this in text, not your interpretation of a map, if this is notable information it should be no problem to do so. TylerBurden (talk) 17:11, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

its not my "interpretation", it's what the map says from ISW themselves, they confirmed Russia's capture of both Myrnohrad AND Svitle in the map Durranistan (talk) 00:33, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Yea "in the map", not in the actual text portion of the report as they did with Myrnohrad, so it makes no sense for you to insert it and give it an equal amount of WP:WEIGHT. You have been editing this topic area for long enough that you should understand this. TylerBurden (talk) 17:55, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

it doesn't make it my "interpretation" of the situation, it's still reported by ISW that both settlements were captured and it doesn't matter if they didn't elaborated on Svitle since ISW is a reliable source anyways, if you have an issue with that you have to talk to ISW themselves Durranistan (talk) 01:33, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Luckily I don't because that's not how any of this works, I assume you did not read WP:WEIGHT, or perhaps you place more importance on reporting Russian military successes than following Wikipedia policy. Either way there's enough of a trend here that further violations will be brought to WP:AE as you're now also responding to issues with your edits by violating WP:CIVIL. TylerBurden (talk) 14:20, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

@Gotitbro Hey a newcomer this side, So thing I just able to find their was a vicious distortion regarding the actual territorial boundaries of the former Sikh Empire to which all of the contemplated historian agreed upon, but even after the logistics consensus was not in his desired favour (→See here ) close the miscellaneous User, changed it epigraphy and manually obscure such highly anticipated counteraction on the encyclical platform and just claiming large part of history dosent change it reality and this need to be intervened before its too late to tackle this shortcomings issues that's it. ~2026-14069-54 (talk) 16:40, 4 March 2026 (