User talk:E0004AA

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EatingCarBatteries was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
EatingCarBatteries (contribs | talk) 04:16, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, E0004AA! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EatingCarBatteries (contribs | talk) 04:16, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

January 2026

Information icon Hello, I'm Yue. An edit that you recently made to Draft:Lax (surname) seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Yue🌙 (talk) 06:39, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

And an additional note: Please stop resubmitting the draft and spamming reviewers' talk pages requesting a review. Any and all experienced users will decline your draft in its current state because it is wholly generated by an LLM (AI). You may be blocked if you continue this pattern of behaviour. Yue🌙 (talk) 06:42, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
I used LLMs solely to make grammatical corrections to statements of fact derived from the sources. What additional steps should I take to avoid the article being rejected? All sources are properly cited and independently verifiable. E0004AA (talk) 06:45, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lax (surname) (January 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AllWeKnowOfHeaven were:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 22:22, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI