User talk:EnDanseuse
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is EnDanseuse's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Anne Querrien has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
ChrysGalley (talk) 19:22, 5 March 2026 (UTC)- Just to add @EnDanseuse, I can see this article has had some issues on French Wikipedia, and by coincidence I had a few concerns earlier about the sourcing here too. There is plenty for verification, but the notability issue - in terms of significant coverage - was open to challenge. However there is a provision under WP:NAUTHOR, which in one version is "two books, two reviews each book". You will see that I have indeed added 4 book reviews in citations, all academic reviews with DOI, so that's the best there is. There were other reviews that I could have used. However if you were considering making further improvements, you could consider drawing some material out of those 4 reviews into the text, summarising in other words, just so that this is clear that the subject qualifies under NAUTHOR. ChrysGalley (talk) 19:34, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
- Apologies, @EnDanseuse - I see you did already have 3 of the 4 sources already, at least you have one more now. The point about drawing out from the reviews remains, since it wasn't obvious on my first reading of the draft. ChrysGalley (talk) 20:06, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
- hello! thank you so much for your close attention and offer to more directly draw from the reviews. Ill gladly work in that direction. EnDanseuse (talk) 20:20, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
- Apologies, @EnDanseuse - I see you did already have 3 of the 4 sources already, at least you have one more now. The point about drawing out from the reviews remains, since it wasn't obvious on my first reading of the draft. ChrysGalley (talk) 20:06, 5 March 2026 (UTC)