User talk:FalconMarooni
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
June 2025
Hello, I'm TonySt. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to David Muir have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. —tony 17:01, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at David Muir. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 17:02, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- I correctly pointed out that David Muir is no longer a journalist. He is a commentator and an achor. Why is that so controversial? Have you even watched his show in the last 8-10 months? FalconMarooni (talk) 17:06, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Tom Llamas. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 17:04, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- This is non-sensical. Everything I posted was referenced. How about you debate on the merits and the references instead of throwing accusations? FalconMarooni (talk) 17:05, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- See our policy on WP:NPOV. The references aren't the issue - it's the neutral point of view. You seem to be promoting Llamas. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 17:07, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- He is a notable journalist. His TV ratings are second to only your favorite David Muir. Yet the difference is their pages is stark. I can see that you reverted my edits on Llama's page as well. What makes you the gatekeeper on Wikipedia? What if I started reverting every single edit you make on Wikipedia? This is the law of the jungle!!! FalconMarooni (talk) 17:09, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Especially with the disclosure that you made on your user page, I shouldn't need to explain that there is a clear conflict of interest, not just with regard to Llamas but also the competing news broadcast. When I edit articles that I have a personal connection to, I use WP:Requested edits and the Articles for Creation process. You inherently have an interest in promoting Llamas and reducing the quality of the Muir article - we cannot have that on our project. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 17:13, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not reducing Muir's quality. You guys have built his profile in a flattering way. Who in their right mind would call him a journalist? He covers Barbara Streisand when the world is on fire, spends a month vacationing in Rome under the guise of covering the Pope's funeral, covering LA fires with literal clothespin on his clothes to make him look hot and you revert my edits all because I said he wasn't a real journalist. FalconMarooni (talk) 17:15, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Literally just went through your editing history and reverting is basically how you spend your time on Wikipedia. Instead of letting other portray and post truth here, you just tear down everything you say without engaging in a rational and adult way. FalconMarooni (talk) 17:13, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- That's called reverting vandalism. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 17:15, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Besides Llamas is Lester Holt's replacement, do you know what that means? And his views have only gone up since back when Holt used to run the show. Llamas covers serious topics unlike album launches of the elderly. I will report you. FalconMarooni (talk) 17:17, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- You're free to believe all that! Go write a blog! However, we're an encyclopedia. We're not a place for you to vent your frustrations or idolize Llamas in a non-neutral way. And don't worry - I know exactly who Llamas, Holt, Muir, Brian Williams and Norah O'Donnell are. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 17:19, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Besides Llamas is Lester Holt's replacement, do you know what that means? And his views have only gone up since back when Holt used to run the show. Llamas covers serious topics unlike album launches of the elderly. I will report you. FalconMarooni (talk) 17:17, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- That's called reverting vandalism. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 17:15, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Especially with the disclosure that you made on your user page, I shouldn't need to explain that there is a clear conflict of interest, not just with regard to Llamas but also the competing news broadcast. When I edit articles that I have a personal connection to, I use WP:Requested edits and the Articles for Creation process. You inherently have an interest in promoting Llamas and reducing the quality of the Muir article - we cannot have that on our project. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 17:13, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- He is a notable journalist. His TV ratings are second to only your favorite David Muir. Yet the difference is their pages is stark. I can see that you reverted my edits on Llama's page as well. What makes you the gatekeeper on Wikipedia? What if I started reverting every single edit you make on Wikipedia? This is the law of the jungle!!! FalconMarooni (talk) 17:09, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- See our policy on WP:NPOV. The references aren't the issue - it's the neutral point of view. You seem to be promoting Llamas. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 17:07, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 17:35, 30 June 2025 (UTC)