User talk:Finsternis

Welcome!

Hello, Finsternis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 18:05, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

• Please be more careful with nominating articles for deletion. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 18:05, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for your note at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michal Heiman (2nd nomination). I don't think new editors are useless. But I should point out that it is well settled that AfD is not to be used as a means to spur others to clean up an article. In fact -- it is not at all necessary that editors do so ... it is enough that the refs exist. The onus is on the nom to check for refs that exist but are not reflected in the article. If they do exist, and are sufficient, it is not proper to nom the article for cleanup. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 00:20, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Acroterion (talk) 02:35, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 02:57, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Men Going Their Own Way, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 03:12, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 12:06, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

And I see I’ve warned you before about similar problems in the past. Please stop using talkpages as fora for hostility. Acroterion (talk) 12:08, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

There have not been any "problems" the past. What you 8 tertret that way are simple disagreements about you insisting on ignoring the NPOV standard - something I keep mentioning but you have not addressed. Disagreement is not hostility. You're the one being hostile by making theats instead of discussing the very valid points I have raised. Finsternis (talk) 13:16, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

I am simply discussing the content of the entry, which is what talk pages are for. Nothing could be more appropriate. Whatsinappropriateis your threatening someone you disagree with. Finsternis (talk) 13:11, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

I am simply discussing the content of the entry isn't what you did here , that was just offensive venting about your perceptions of editors who disagree with you. If you do anything of that sort again, you may be blocked, either from the article and talkpage or entirely. Acroterion (talk) 14:05, 13 February 2026 (UTC)