User talk:Frimshaqi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hi Frimshaqi! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:
Happy editing! Infinitywiki2 (talk) 08:08, 14 February 2026 (UTC)
Counter vandalism
Why did you undo this edit? 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 05:24, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
- Also, how is this vandalism? 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 05:28, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
Nehaal Naseem
Hello. What's going on in this edit? Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 11:16, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
- It was a reverted edit i did after a person added unesseccary whitespace Frimshaqi (talk) 11:18, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
- That's not a crime. In fact it's expected. I think you need to get a grip on your reverting. -- zzuuzz (talk) 11:20, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
- Just to give another example, Special:Diff/1338478016. This is not vandalism - most people would think this was an accurate edit, if it weren't for the obscure (and slightly weird) fact that Wikipedia does not include FA Cup appearances in infobox summaries. This requires explanation instead of vague warnings, and calling it unconstructive or vandalism is not helpful to anyone. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:02, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
- That's not a crime. In fact it's expected. I think you need to get a grip on your reverting. -- zzuuzz (talk) 11:20, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
"Frimtrol"
I have no idea what "Frimtrol" is supposed to be (or where the code for it even came from), but is it really necessary to report a user to AIV four times in the space of a few minutes? Sugar Tax (talk) 11:23, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
- To me, it looks like "Frimtrol" is entirely AI generated. Massive changes to the code are made within minutes of each other, with the code being rewritten over and over. The "version" at the top of the script file keeps going up and down. It outputs malformatted warnings, usually of the wrong level. It's hardcoded with this user's signature and an outdated timestamp. This user joined on the 14th and created this script on the 15th. I would appreciate if @Frimshaqi: could enlighten us as to what's been going on with this script, how it was created, and why they've created it so soon after joining Wikipedia. IsCat (talk) 07:26, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- Used to be a editor of the site decided to make a semi-automatic tool to help which i admit i did use AI for i made a documentation page for anyone else who wanted to use it Frimshaqi (talk) 07:28, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- also i use ai just for the barebones and then i layer my script over it its more assisted really Frimshaqi (talk) 07:29, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- also the replies do work at the appopriate level ive double checked all functionality to make sure it works as intended and doesn't damage the site Frimshaqi (talk) 07:32, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- The AI usage is somewhat concerning. It also appears like you've used AI in articles, specifically this edit. I'm sure you can imagine why some might be suspicious of your high volume of AI-driven activity so soon after joining Wikipedia. If you've previously had an account, it's probably best to let people know what account that is. IsCat (talk) 07:38, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- I know why your suspicious my old account went by the name of Shaqiyeeeeeeee (I forgot the amount of e's) for the edit you mentioned I actually didn't use AI for that I was just trying to be as formal as possible. I only used AI to assist me in my tool making process. Frimshaqi (talk) 07:58, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- I do know how to code JS I just decided to try speed up the process ofc I proofchecked the code in Sublime Text that's why it also appears as copy and paste Frimshaqi (talk) 08:01, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- The AI usage is somewhat concerning. It also appears like you've used AI in articles, specifically this edit. I'm sure you can imagine why some might be suspicious of your high volume of AI-driven activity so soon after joining Wikipedia. If you've previously had an account, it's probably best to let people know what account that is. IsCat (talk) 07:38, 16 February 2026 (UTC)