User talk:Gavetern
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Gavetern, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts |
|---|
Additional Resources |
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 02:53, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
!
1) The article has been edited about 500 times since 2007, and continued to be edited regularly. 2) Most discussion consists of explanations of minor comments. Some recent comments concern debates over the former name of the American kestrel, the Sparrow Hawk. 3) Overall, this article is quite comprehensive. I thought it covered much of the important information concerning the American kestrel, and so it is considered “good,” However, not every paragraph has a citation, and one paragraph with multiple body measurements is followed by a list of citations. There should be a more organized way to represent this information. In addition, I found a sentence that appears opinionated. This sentence nods to possible bias in a statement, using the word “likely.” I don’t think uncertain information like this has a place on Wikipedia. 4) I’d like to add information on the physiology of the American kestrel. Luckily, no one has beaten me to it! There is only one sentence about their use in scientific studies tacked on at the end of the article, so I’d like to expound on why they are useful model organisms. I might add information of studies of metabolic rate and stress response.Gavetern (talk) 15:52, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Nick, thanks for a thorough evaluation of the article on American Kestrel. I will assign it to you for your Wiki work this semester. Rico.schultz (talk) 18:35, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- Nick, I see that you have made quite a few changes to the article in the last few days. I have a couple concerns. One is that you have published changes in advance of the peer review step that I had planned for this exercise. Secondly, the series of sentences on scientific findings are in a section on relationship to humans, but I don't really view the studies as representing this subject. Rico.schultz (talk) 16:09, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
!
Nick, I looked over the allometry article but wasn't sure where you had changed anything. I suggest that you also add a bit to the terminology, you could note that another way of referring to the so-called negative allometry of the mouse-to-elephant curve (terminology I dislike because it is confusing) is 'hypoallometry'. I agree with another commentator on this article that the graph in the picture is misleading because it doesn't clearly show that both of the axes are log-tranformedRico.schultz (talk) 13:04, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Nick you need to move your draft article here to your user talk page (right now it is in the talk page of your sandbox) so your taxon teammates can see it!!!!Rico.schultz (talk) 17:11, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Oh I see--this page. Done! Gavetern (talk) 22:54, 26 April 2016 (UTC)